INDIA, today, is the 2nd fastest growing economy in the world. The entire world is looking up to us and unfortunately we have in our midst people who are contriving to take us back to where we were thousands of years ago. As long as we, each one of us, cling-on to retrograde feelings like casteism, religious bigotry, regionalism, etc, we can’t really blame those who exploit the authority in their hands to further their clan’s selfish ends. The time has come to consign such ill feelings (not to forget corruption and inefficiency in public services) to the flames in the interest of our and the future generations.
The irregularities in 2003 Group-I had been brought out in the open on the 11th Mar’ 10 and Group-II on the 26th. How many political parties and politicians have genuinely voiced their concern?? A handful ?! Isn’t it shocking to note that the TDP is trying to brush off it’s hands by writing a letter to the PM? May be their leaders aren’t aware of the provisions of the Constitution. Let’s teach them what Article 317 of the Constitution of India has to say. Wouldn’t want to waste our breath on parties like the TRS, PRP, BJP, etc which haven’t even raised this issue on any forum. The least said about the ruling Congress, the better!
This brings these questions to mind!
1.Do they have any right to rule us considering their lack of awareness of the Constitutional provisions?
2. May be the political parties think that the weaker sections of the society along with the un-influential OCs (which together form the majority) are dispensable and they can rule without our votes! That they can fool around with our lives and careers.
3. How long will we allow crooked, cunning, exploitative politicians to take us for a ride?
In the interest of our nation, we will not allow that to continue! Let’s tell them “we’ve had enough” ! “We need deeds not just words”!
Our country’s journey towards unbridled prosperity and ever-lasting peace will truly begin… the day… we begin to ask these questions and shed all the retrograde feelings!
Let’s transform India !
Jai Hind!
Monday, March 29, 2010
What kinda justice?
1. In the case of DCs : 7 posts in open competition
Out of 7 posts in open competition, two candidates belonging to BC-D made it to DC in the open competition even though they were awarded 32 and 64 marks in the interview… that’s a median of 48.
1.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-D) 12203120 687 32 719
2.Venkateshwarulu Vasan (BC-D) 12228599 643 64 707
However, the Reddy candidates who made it to the DC posts were awarded marks 73, 55, 83, 75 in the interview… that is a median of 72 out of 90 which is 80% of the interview marks.
1.Venugopal Reddy 12216921 657 73 732
2.Vinay Krishna Reddy 12241876 666 55 721
3.Venkata Ramana Reddy 11209318 635 85 720
4.Prabhakar Reddy 11004313 634 75 709
The Cut off in open competition (7 vacancies) for DC posts is 707 which was achieved by:
Hanumantha Rao M 12256687 657 50 707
Venkateshwarulu Vasan (BC-D) 12228599 643 64 707
However, Mr. Chandra Shekar Goud who scored 678 marks in the written , i.e. 2nd highest overall… got only 28 marks in the interview and a total of 706 and got RTO in open competition.
Chandrasekhar Goud(BC-B) 12232100 678 28 706
It has to be noted that, he could have made it as a DC and that too in the open competition , if he had got even 30 marks in the interview.
2. In the case of CTO, out of 8 vacancies in the Open Competition
4 candidates belonging to BC-B made it in the open competition even though they were awarded marks of 62, 78, 78, 51.5, i.e. a median of 67.
Madhu Babu K (BC-B) 20102402 634 62 696
Shashidhara Chary (BC-B) 12229049 605 78 683
Seshadri T (BC-B) 11200018 600 78 678
Nagarjuna Rao (BC-A) 10500775 622 51.5 673.5
However, 3 Reddy’s made it as CTO with interview marks of 70, 83, 78, i.e. a median of 77, i.e., 86% marks out of 90
1.Arvind Reddy 11400057 622 70 692
2.Jitender Reddy 12202403 602 83 685
3.Raghunadha Reddy 20929096 602 78 680
In the case of CTO Open competition (women), 1 BC candidate made it in the open even though she secured 60 marks out of 90 in the interview.
Naga Jyothi Dasari (BC-D) 10708932 596 60 656
Whereas, candidates belong to OC, made it with interview marks of 67, 80, 73, i.e. a median of 73.33 (81% of 90)
Sumathi G 11201373 597 67 664
Hema Indukuri 10801981 575 80 655
Mangala Deepti 12209330 583 73 656
3. In the case of DSP Cat-II (10 Vacancies in the open)
A candidate belonging to the BCs got selected in the open competition although he was awarded only 21 marks in the interview.
Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) 10601169 649 21 670
If he had secured 59 marks in the interview, he would have got selected as a DC in the open competition. Even if he had to claim reservation, he would have become a DC had he got just 27 marks in the interview.
However, 4 Reddy’s got selected even though they secured less marks than him in the written with interview marks of 85, 65, 76, 82, i.e. a median of 77.(i.e. 86% of 90). Please note that Narayana Reddy K scored a full 60 marks less than Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) in the written.
Koti Reddy Nandyala 12203647 610 85 695
Panasa Reddy T 12233569 609 65 674
Ravi Shankar Reddy 11104297 595 76 671
Narayana Reddy K 12241065 589 82 671
This implies that out of 10 DSP posts in open competition, 4 were cornered by Reddy’s alone due to phenomenally high marks in the interview.
Here, it is to be mentioned that 2 Candidates belonging to SCs who scored more in written than all the Reddy’s mentioned above, got selected under reservation quota with interview marks of 43 and 13.5, i.e a median of 28.25 marks out of 90!
Umamaheshwar B (SC) 12212942 616 43 659
Samayjan Rao Ch (SC) 10606097 616 13.5 629.5
4. In the case of RTO: 2 vacancies in Open competition
Two candidates belonging to the BCs made it in the open even though they were awarded marks of 28 and 67, i.e. a median of 47.5 out of 90 as they scored very high marks in the written… 678 and 637 respectively.
1.Chandrasekhar Goud(BC-B) 12232100 678 28 706
2.Siva Lingaiah C (BC-B) 12210534 638 67 705
There was no competition here as OC candidates… esp. Reddy’s got DC posts with interview marks of 85 and 75, i.e. a median of 80, i.e. close to 90% of 90 marks. It has to be noticed that they got less marks in written than Mr. Chandrasekhar Goud and Mr. Siva Lingaiah C
1.Venkata Ramana Reddy 11209318 635 85 720
2.Prabhakar Reddy 11004313 634 75 709
In effect, the BC candidates got selected in Open competition as RTO only because they missed out on becoming Deputy Collector in Open competition !
Here it is to be mentioned that a BC candidate got selected as CTO by default as he missed out on becoming a DC and that too in open competition.
Madhu Babu K (BC-B) 20102402 634 62 696
5. In the case of DSP (jails): 5 vacancies in open competition,
2 candidates belonging to BCs got selected in Open even though they were given just 21 and 60 marks in the interview, i.e., a median of 40.5.
1.Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) 10300512 628 21 649
2.Giridhar Ravula (BC-B) 12202133 589 60 649
Here, it is to be mentioned that Mr. Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) got selected as DSP jails in the open by default because people (shown below) who got lesser marks than him in the written got selected as DSP, CTO in the open competition.
DSPs
Koti Reddy Nandyala 12203647 610 85 695
Panasa Reddy T 12233569 609 65 674
Ravi Shankar Reddy 11104297 595 76 671
Narayana Reddy K 12241065 589 82 671
CTOs
1.Arvind Reddy 11400057 622 70 692
2.Jitender Reddy 12202403 602 83 685
3.Raghunadha Reddy 20929096 602 78 680
The median of all the above Reddy candidates is 77, i.e. 85.55% of 90 marks.
If this is the case regarding the plum posts of DC, DSP, CTO and RTO, imagine what it could’ve been in other posts such as Asst. Accounts, Officers, Asst. Treasury Officers, Deputy Registrars and the least preferred service of MPDO.
BCs
1.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-D) 12203120 687 32 719
2.Venkateshwarulu Vasan (BC-D) 12228599 643 64 707
3.Chandrasekhar Goud(BC-B) 12232100 678 28 706
4.Siva Lingaiah C (BC-B) 12210534 638 67 705
5.Madhu Babu K (BC-B) 20102402 634 62 696
6.Shashidhara Chary (BC-B) 12229049 605 78 683
7.Seshadri T (BC-B) 11200018 600 78 678
8.Nagarjuna Rao (BC-A) 10500775 622 51.5 673.5
9.Naga Jyothi Dasari (BC-D) 10708932 596 60 656
10.Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) 10300512 628 21 649
11.Giridhar Ravula (BC-B) 12202133 589 60 649
12.Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) 10601169 649 21 670
The median of the marks scored in written by BC candidates is 635.5 out of 900, while the median of interview marks is 52.75 out of 90, i.e. 58.6%.
Reddy’s
1.Venugopal Reddy 12216921 657 73 732
2.Vinay Krishna Reddy 12241876 666 55 721
3.Venkata Ramana Reddy 11209318 635 85 720
4.Prabhakar Reddy 11004313 634 75 709
5.Koti Reddy Nandyala 12203647 610 85 695
6.Panasa Reddy T 12233569 609 65 674
7.Ravi Shankar Reddy 11104297 595 76 671
8.Narayana Reddy K 12241065 589 82 671
9.Arvind Reddy 11400057 622 70 692
10.Jitender Reddy 12202403 602 83 685
11.Raghunadha Reddy 20929096 602 78 680
The median of the marks scored by Reddy candidates in written is 620.1 out of 900, whereas in interview the median of the Reddy’s is 75.4, i.e a phenomenal 83.79%.
It is to be mentioned that no Public Service Commission in India hardly awards more than 80% to any candidate. Then how is it that the median of the Reddy’s itself is close to 84%?
BCs who got selected in the open competition scored on an average 15.4 marks (635.5-620.1) more than those Reddy’s who got selected in the Open.
However, when it comes to the interview, Reddy’s were awarded on an average 22.65 (75.4-52.75) marks more than the BC candidates.
What kind of justice is it when BC candidates who could have made it in the open to DC and DSP posts were forced to make it in the open to posts like CTO and RTO ?
SCs
DSP posts
Umamaheshwar B (SC) 12212942 616 43 659
Samayjan Rao Ch (SC) 10606097 616 13.5 629.5
With regard to SC candidates, the Median of the written exam of the candidates selected to DSP posts was 616, whereas the median in the interview was 28.25.
Whereas for the Reddy’s who got selected to the posts of DSP, the median of the written exam was 600.75 and the median of the interview marks of the Reddy’s was 77 out of 90, i.e., an unimaginable 85.55%.
It is clear that, though SCs scored 15.25 (616-600.75) marks more on an average than the Reddy candidates, they were awarded a mind-blowing 48.75 (77-28.25) marks less on an average than their Reddy counterparts in the interviews.
In the case of MPDO please refer to the marks range in another attachment wherein, 37 OC candidates were awarded interview marks in the range of 75-85, whereas only 16 BC candidates were awarded marks in that range.
Similarly, 35 OCs are in the range of 65-75, whereas 30 BCs are in the same range.
Even though OCs scored heavily in the interviews, as many as 29 BCs made it in the open competition for MPDOs… it is to be mentioned that it is the least preferred Group-1 post.
To give you an idea as many as 84 of the 237, i.e. more than 35% of the posts are lying unoccupied even after more than 3 years.
Out of 7 posts in open competition, two candidates belonging to BC-D made it to DC in the open competition even though they were awarded 32 and 64 marks in the interview… that’s a median of 48.
1.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-D) 12203120 687 32 719
2.Venkateshwarulu Vasan (BC-D) 12228599 643 64 707
However, the Reddy candidates who made it to the DC posts were awarded marks 73, 55, 83, 75 in the interview… that is a median of 72 out of 90 which is 80% of the interview marks.
1.Venugopal Reddy 12216921 657 73 732
2.Vinay Krishna Reddy 12241876 666 55 721
3.Venkata Ramana Reddy 11209318 635 85 720
4.Prabhakar Reddy 11004313 634 75 709
The Cut off in open competition (7 vacancies) for DC posts is 707 which was achieved by:
Hanumantha Rao M 12256687 657 50 707
Venkateshwarulu Vasan (BC-D) 12228599 643 64 707
However, Mr. Chandra Shekar Goud who scored 678 marks in the written , i.e. 2nd highest overall… got only 28 marks in the interview and a total of 706 and got RTO in open competition.
Chandrasekhar Goud(BC-B) 12232100 678 28 706
It has to be noted that, he could have made it as a DC and that too in the open competition , if he had got even 30 marks in the interview.
2. In the case of CTO, out of 8 vacancies in the Open Competition
4 candidates belonging to BC-B made it in the open competition even though they were awarded marks of 62, 78, 78, 51.5, i.e. a median of 67.
Madhu Babu K (BC-B) 20102402 634 62 696
Shashidhara Chary (BC-B) 12229049 605 78 683
Seshadri T (BC-B) 11200018 600 78 678
Nagarjuna Rao (BC-A) 10500775 622 51.5 673.5
However, 3 Reddy’s made it as CTO with interview marks of 70, 83, 78, i.e. a median of 77, i.e., 86% marks out of 90
1.Arvind Reddy 11400057 622 70 692
2.Jitender Reddy 12202403 602 83 685
3.Raghunadha Reddy 20929096 602 78 680
In the case of CTO Open competition (women), 1 BC candidate made it in the open even though she secured 60 marks out of 90 in the interview.
Naga Jyothi Dasari (BC-D) 10708932 596 60 656
Whereas, candidates belong to OC, made it with interview marks of 67, 80, 73, i.e. a median of 73.33 (81% of 90)
Sumathi G 11201373 597 67 664
Hema Indukuri 10801981 575 80 655
Mangala Deepti 12209330 583 73 656
3. In the case of DSP Cat-II (10 Vacancies in the open)
A candidate belonging to the BCs got selected in the open competition although he was awarded only 21 marks in the interview.
Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) 10601169 649 21 670
If he had secured 59 marks in the interview, he would have got selected as a DC in the open competition. Even if he had to claim reservation, he would have become a DC had he got just 27 marks in the interview.
However, 4 Reddy’s got selected even though they secured less marks than him in the written with interview marks of 85, 65, 76, 82, i.e. a median of 77.(i.e. 86% of 90). Please note that Narayana Reddy K scored a full 60 marks less than Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) in the written.
Koti Reddy Nandyala 12203647 610 85 695
Panasa Reddy T 12233569 609 65 674
Ravi Shankar Reddy 11104297 595 76 671
Narayana Reddy K 12241065 589 82 671
This implies that out of 10 DSP posts in open competition, 4 were cornered by Reddy’s alone due to phenomenally high marks in the interview.
Here, it is to be mentioned that 2 Candidates belonging to SCs who scored more in written than all the Reddy’s mentioned above, got selected under reservation quota with interview marks of 43 and 13.5, i.e a median of 28.25 marks out of 90!
Umamaheshwar B (SC) 12212942 616 43 659
Samayjan Rao Ch (SC) 10606097 616 13.5 629.5
4. In the case of RTO: 2 vacancies in Open competition
Two candidates belonging to the BCs made it in the open even though they were awarded marks of 28 and 67, i.e. a median of 47.5 out of 90 as they scored very high marks in the written… 678 and 637 respectively.
1.Chandrasekhar Goud(BC-B) 12232100 678 28 706
2.Siva Lingaiah C (BC-B) 12210534 638 67 705
There was no competition here as OC candidates… esp. Reddy’s got DC posts with interview marks of 85 and 75, i.e. a median of 80, i.e. close to 90% of 90 marks. It has to be noticed that they got less marks in written than Mr. Chandrasekhar Goud and Mr. Siva Lingaiah C
1.Venkata Ramana Reddy 11209318 635 85 720
2.Prabhakar Reddy 11004313 634 75 709
In effect, the BC candidates got selected in Open competition as RTO only because they missed out on becoming Deputy Collector in Open competition !
Here it is to be mentioned that a BC candidate got selected as CTO by default as he missed out on becoming a DC and that too in open competition.
Madhu Babu K (BC-B) 20102402 634 62 696
5. In the case of DSP (jails): 5 vacancies in open competition,
2 candidates belonging to BCs got selected in Open even though they were given just 21 and 60 marks in the interview, i.e., a median of 40.5.
1.Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) 10300512 628 21 649
2.Giridhar Ravula (BC-B) 12202133 589 60 649
Here, it is to be mentioned that Mr. Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) got selected as DSP jails in the open by default because people (shown below) who got lesser marks than him in the written got selected as DSP, CTO in the open competition.
DSPs
Koti Reddy Nandyala 12203647 610 85 695
Panasa Reddy T 12233569 609 65 674
Ravi Shankar Reddy 11104297 595 76 671
Narayana Reddy K 12241065 589 82 671
CTOs
1.Arvind Reddy 11400057 622 70 692
2.Jitender Reddy 12202403 602 83 685
3.Raghunadha Reddy 20929096 602 78 680
The median of all the above Reddy candidates is 77, i.e. 85.55% of 90 marks.
If this is the case regarding the plum posts of DC, DSP, CTO and RTO, imagine what it could’ve been in other posts such as Asst. Accounts, Officers, Asst. Treasury Officers, Deputy Registrars and the least preferred service of MPDO.
BCs
1.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-D) 12203120 687 32 719
2.Venkateshwarulu Vasan (BC-D) 12228599 643 64 707
3.Chandrasekhar Goud(BC-B) 12232100 678 28 706
4.Siva Lingaiah C (BC-B) 12210534 638 67 705
5.Madhu Babu K (BC-B) 20102402 634 62 696
6.Shashidhara Chary (BC-B) 12229049 605 78 683
7.Seshadri T (BC-B) 11200018 600 78 678
8.Nagarjuna Rao (BC-A) 10500775 622 51.5 673.5
9.Naga Jyothi Dasari (BC-D) 10708932 596 60 656
10.Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) 10300512 628 21 649
11.Giridhar Ravula (BC-B) 12202133 589 60 649
12.Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) 10601169 649 21 670
The median of the marks scored in written by BC candidates is 635.5 out of 900, while the median of interview marks is 52.75 out of 90, i.e. 58.6%.
Reddy’s
1.Venugopal Reddy 12216921 657 73 732
2.Vinay Krishna Reddy 12241876 666 55 721
3.Venkata Ramana Reddy 11209318 635 85 720
4.Prabhakar Reddy 11004313 634 75 709
5.Koti Reddy Nandyala 12203647 610 85 695
6.Panasa Reddy T 12233569 609 65 674
7.Ravi Shankar Reddy 11104297 595 76 671
8.Narayana Reddy K 12241065 589 82 671
9.Arvind Reddy 11400057 622 70 692
10.Jitender Reddy 12202403 602 83 685
11.Raghunadha Reddy 20929096 602 78 680
The median of the marks scored by Reddy candidates in written is 620.1 out of 900, whereas in interview the median of the Reddy’s is 75.4, i.e a phenomenal 83.79%.
It is to be mentioned that no Public Service Commission in India hardly awards more than 80% to any candidate. Then how is it that the median of the Reddy’s itself is close to 84%?
BCs who got selected in the open competition scored on an average 15.4 marks (635.5-620.1) more than those Reddy’s who got selected in the Open.
However, when it comes to the interview, Reddy’s were awarded on an average 22.65 (75.4-52.75) marks more than the BC candidates.
What kind of justice is it when BC candidates who could have made it in the open to DC and DSP posts were forced to make it in the open to posts like CTO and RTO ?
SCs
DSP posts
Umamaheshwar B (SC) 12212942 616 43 659
Samayjan Rao Ch (SC) 10606097 616 13.5 629.5
With regard to SC candidates, the Median of the written exam of the candidates selected to DSP posts was 616, whereas the median in the interview was 28.25.
Whereas for the Reddy’s who got selected to the posts of DSP, the median of the written exam was 600.75 and the median of the interview marks of the Reddy’s was 77 out of 90, i.e., an unimaginable 85.55%.
It is clear that, though SCs scored 15.25 (616-600.75) marks more on an average than the Reddy candidates, they were awarded a mind-blowing 48.75 (77-28.25) marks less on an average than their Reddy counterparts in the interviews.
In the case of MPDO please refer to the marks range in another attachment wherein, 37 OC candidates were awarded interview marks in the range of 75-85, whereas only 16 BC candidates were awarded marks in that range.
Similarly, 35 OCs are in the range of 65-75, whereas 30 BCs are in the same range.
Even though OCs scored heavily in the interviews, as many as 29 BCs made it in the open competition for MPDOs… it is to be mentioned that it is the least preferred Group-1 post.
To give you an idea as many as 84 of the 237, i.e. more than 35% of the posts are lying unoccupied even after more than 3 years.
Very very high marks
ABNORMALLY HIGH
Name of the candidate HT No. Marks Obtained TOTAL
450 50 500
1.Neeraja Sriyapu Reddy 22205860 291 48 339
2.Soujanya Rao 20402063 299 48 347
3.Yadiah Nimma (ST) 22282965 303 48 351
4.Kranthi Boda (BC-A) 22203577 304 48 352
5.Ram Prasad Mandagiri (BC-B) 20702209 319 48 367
6.Naveen Marrapu (BC-D) 22287672 318 47 365
7.Pradeep Kumar M 22206413 325 47 372
8.Narahari Rao Ravipati 22205499 327 47 374
9.Narender Tadisen 21401044 331 47 378
10.Venkat Reddy Koppula 22212793 349 47 396
11.Madhusudhan Reddy Y 21201108 357 47 404
12.Manemma Macha (SC) 22204738 268 46 314
13.Venkata Lakshmi Potturi 21400493 301 46 347
14.Swarna Latha K (BC-D) 22211898 305 46 351
15.Venkata Durga Bhavani Allu 22281233 308 46 354
16.Srinivasa Rao Pinniti (BC-D) 90300003 317 46 363
17.Somashekar Chennuri (BC-B) 22277201 321 46 367
18.Rama Krishna Vendrapu (BC-D) 20201732 324 46 370
19.Dasaratha Rami Reddy K 22285162 324 46 370
20.Srinivasa Rao M (BC-D) 20222612 326 46 372
21.Eeshwara Reddy Katappagari 21200496 321 46 367
22.Obulanaidu S 22205943 326 46 372
23.Nagarjuna Reddy G 22108581 326 46 372
24.Ahmad Shaik (BC-B) 22107243 328 46 374
25.Venkata Prasad Gollamuri 22212937 328 46 374
26.Mohana Rao T (BC-B) 22204975 330 46 376
27.Syam Prakash Reddy M 21014380 334 46 380
28.Mahipal Kurella 22204576 334 46 380
29.Srikrishna D.Garaga 22210388 339 46 385
30.Shaheeda Begum Md. (BC-B) 22209329 341 46 387
31.Gowri Shankara Rao G (BC-D) 20200618 343 46 389
32.Srinivasu M 22210953 348 46 394
33.Sirisha Kunadhi Raju 20615906 302 45 347
34.Veera Prasad G (BC-D) 22212621 308 45 353
35.Venkat Reddy Y 22212785 324 45 369
36. Subba Reddy G 22111119 348 45 393
37.Madhuri Mulugu 20600657 342 45 387
38.Chennaiah K (BC-B) 20912622 341 45 386
39.Pulla Reddy V 22206721 358 45 403
40.Sridevi Vandanapu 22261518 301 45 346
41.Krishna Reddy Male 22100509 335 45 380
42.Vishalakshi Chowdermet (BC-B) 22213989 279 45 324
43.Siva Subrahmanyam P 20702888 330 45 375
44.Raghavendranath C (BC-B) 22206895 307 45 352
45.Srinivas Reddy S 22211194 329 45 374
46.Chandra Lekha Reddy K 22264710 289 45 334
47.Adinarayana Reddy M 20700025 329 45 374
48.Narsi Reddy Gummitha 22205755 325 45 370
49.Radha Naga Padmaja Duggudurthi (BC-A) 20201629 252 45 297
50.Nagalakshmi Tummala 20401084 313 45 358
51.Sudershanam B BC-B 22279051 321 45 366
52.Shivaram Cheganti SC 22209595 293 45 338
53.Prabhakara Rao M (SC) 22206374 336 45 381
54.Krishna Kanth M 20701084 336 45 381
55.Anuradha K Budhavarapu (BC-B)22200459 285 45 330
56. Jayramanaidu Madamanchi 22202809 334 45 379
57.Leela Rani Kota (BC-B) 21011960 297 45 342
58.Sujatha Gajavelli (BC-B) 22211409 277 45 322
59.Vardhanadevi Polanki (BC-B) 21101474 283 45 328
60.Subrahmanyam Muppalla 22211168 328 45 373
61.Pranaheetha Devi G BC-A 22206480 286 44 330
62.Ashok Reddy Y 22200663 338 44 382
63.Jyothi Lakshmi Devi P (BC-B) 21000510 300 44 344
64.Narsi Reddy S 22108692 326 44 370
65.Aparna K 20200094 329 42 371
66.Maheshwar Reddy B 22204567 356 44 400
67.Anupama Muktheswaram (BC-A) 21200127 288 43 331
68.Srilatha Ganta 21701311 340 43 383
69.Suma Thalluri 21701439 318 44 362
70.Uma Rani P 21614543 306 44 350
71.Suvarna P (BC-D) 20308836 324 40 364
72.Venkatesh N (SC) 22281803 316 43 359
73.Anand Kumar P (BC-D) 22200186 332 42 374
74.Suresh Kumar Kollu 22211743 370 43 413
75.Devadas M (SC) 20700543 319 43 362
76.Rajeswari M (BC-D) 20230913 318 42 360
77.Rajender G (BC-A) 22207118 327 42 379
78.Lakshmi V.Namala (SC) 20402725 299 42 341
79.Rajender Reddy N 22207135 347 44 391
80.Sharmila Muttineni 22209469 318 43 361
81.Susheela Konda Gadapa 22211806 310 42 352
82.Ganesh Guntipalli 22201966 342 44 386
83.Rama Lakshmi V.K. (BC-D) 20202961 328 42 370
84.Karimulla Shareif 20500633 321 42 363
85.Venkata Krishna Bokka(BC-B) 21609290 313 43 356
86.Ramaiah Boyapati 22207562 331 43 374
87.NV Raju Gadiraju 22270304 334 44 378
88.Kasaiah Jakkampoodi (BC-A) 21700380 310 40 350
89.Naveen Enumula (SC) 22287675 303 43 346
90.Archana Reddy Edulla 22113574 299 42 341
91.Naga Laxmi Kollu 22205161 331 44 375
92.Radhika Telu (BC-D) 20220285 293 43 336
93.Ramesh Babu Vipparala (SC) 22207853 314 40 354
94. Suresh Kumar Andela (SC) 22211715 301 43 344
95.Bhima Rao G (SC) 22201175 324 44 368
96.Upadhyayanjaneya Satyanarayana 22280416 332 44 376
97.Ravi Sekhar Kumar Yendamuri (BC-A)22208228 341 44 385
98.Venkata Surya Yella Rao 20515151 373 40 413
99.Bala Subrahmanyam G 22200800 351 42 393
100.Venkata Satish Kota 22292154 351 42 393
101.Venkata Ramana Naik R (ST) 21001762 337 43 380
102.Satish Reddy Kalleda 22209109 325 44 369
103.Naga Vara Prasad Adapa 20516205 337 44 381
104.V. Vani Prasad Beela (BC-D) 20301045 331 44 375
105.Kanaka Giri Sastry N.P 22206108 341 44 385
106.David Varaprasad Pamula (SC) 20900210 311 40 351
107. Kalavathi Balepogu 21100426 267 40 317
108.Lakshmidevi K (BC-B) 20600606 283 42 325
109.Prabhakar Reddy B V 22206363 347 40 387
110.Venkata Ramana Rao B (BC-D) 20801555 320 42 362
111.Leela Rani B 20701242 328 43.5 371.5
112.Sivamma P (BC-A) 21215722 269 44 313
113.Sujatha Pujari 21101363 312 42 354
114.Nagarjuna Uppa (BC-B) 22295589 331 40 371
115.Venugopal Reddy Gantla 22213559 335 40 375
116.Nagalakhsmi Ranga 22205230 295 43 338
117.Lakshmi Kodamanchili (BC-B) 20201002 275 44 319
118.Jai Bheem R (SC) 20200706 315 43 358
120.Padmaja Ambati 20717414 311 44 355
121.Venkata Ramesh Nallem 20502659 342 40 382
122.Jairam Satish Babu Rowthu (BC-D)20517421 318 40 358
123.Srinivas Javvadi 22207746 335 40 375
124.Sowjanya Chekka (BC-A) 22259045 245 40 285
125.Sri Kanaka Devi Mendu 22210334 300 42 342
126.Srinivas Palli (BC-D) 22278082 320 44 364
127.Suresh Babu Allangi (ST) 20223036 300 40 340
128.Sivakumari Medikonda (SC) 20801119 271 44 315
129.Srinivasulu Reddy V 20901384 341 44 385
130.Venkata Rao Batchala (BC-D) 20801567 319 42 361
131.Leena A 22204158 301 42 343
132. Aruna Raprolu (BC-B) 20700199 320 44 364
133.Ramkrishna Maram 22207579 343 42 385
134.Brahmananda Reddy M 22264534 334 44 378
135.Vishwanatha Reddy G 22214034 333 44 377
136.Lakshmi D. Nagiri (BC-A) 22203909 313 44 357
137.Indira Banala (BC-B) 22202512 289 43 332
138. Venkata Suneelu T (BC-A) 22213101 339 44 383
139.Chenna Reddy L 22201549 333 42 375
140.Ramesh Reddy A 21201958 334 40 374
141.Venkata Subba Reddy C 22213081 332 40 372
142.Bhaskar M (BC-B) 21016857 310 44 354
143.Hari Krishna Vunnam 21200658 326 40 366
144.Sireesha Juluganti 22209741 318 43 361
145.Phanindra KVS 21301169 322 43 365
146.Srinivasulu Siragam (ST) 22278763 284 40 324
147.Naga Suneetha Rani Chakkera 22295534 282 42 324
148.Bhargava Reddy Patti 22201060 324 41 365
149.Chandrahas K (BC-B) 22201447 308 40 348
150.Satyanarayana Madamanchi 21202202 320 43 363
151.Durga Bhavani G 20509820 288 40 328
152.Venkateswar Reddy V 22281944 358 40 398
153.Kala Sagar T (SC) 22241120 315 42 357
154.Srinivasarao Gunugati 22210940 328 44 372
155.Rama Mohan Baththala 22207632 321 44 365
156.Shyamsundar Palapati (SC) 22276938 283 43 326
157.Karuna Kancherla 22267472 294 43 337
158.Ankama Rao Pilla (OH) 22200388 272 43 315
159.Vijaya Lakshmi Kavalakuntla 22213861 314 40 354
160.Dheeraj Reddy Sadhu 21016523
333 42 375
161.Sita Maha Lakshmi Ch 20615971 306 42 348
162.Sreelatha Meda 22277401 294 42 336
163.Srinivas Reddy T 22210717 326 42 368
164.Vahida Ravi (SC) 22208233 276 40 316
165.Veera Pallam Raju Villa 22212619 360 40 400
166.Venkata Ramana Reddy 21101598 332 40 372
In addition to the 166 candidates, 3 more were awarded marks in excess of 40 (their particulars haven't been furnished by the APPSC). In total, 169 were awarded 80% or more, i.e. 40 marks or more out of 50 in the interviews. This is unprecedented!
No Public Service Commission in India, including the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) awards more than 80% to even a single candidate.
This smacks of irregularities on a phenomenal scale.
Name of the candidate HT No. Marks Obtained TOTAL
450 50 500
1.Neeraja Sriyapu Reddy 22205860 291 48 339
2.Soujanya Rao 20402063 299 48 347
3.Yadiah Nimma (ST) 22282965 303 48 351
4.Kranthi Boda (BC-A) 22203577 304 48 352
5.Ram Prasad Mandagiri (BC-B) 20702209 319 48 367
6.Naveen Marrapu (BC-D) 22287672 318 47 365
7.Pradeep Kumar M 22206413 325 47 372
8.Narahari Rao Ravipati 22205499 327 47 374
9.Narender Tadisen 21401044 331 47 378
10.Venkat Reddy Koppula 22212793 349 47 396
11.Madhusudhan Reddy Y 21201108 357 47 404
12.Manemma Macha (SC) 22204738 268 46 314
13.Venkata Lakshmi Potturi 21400493 301 46 347
14.Swarna Latha K (BC-D) 22211898 305 46 351
15.Venkata Durga Bhavani Allu 22281233 308 46 354
16.Srinivasa Rao Pinniti (BC-D) 90300003 317 46 363
17.Somashekar Chennuri (BC-B) 22277201 321 46 367
18.Rama Krishna Vendrapu (BC-D) 20201732 324 46 370
19.Dasaratha Rami Reddy K 22285162 324 46 370
20.Srinivasa Rao M (BC-D) 20222612 326 46 372
21.Eeshwara Reddy Katappagari 21200496 321 46 367
22.Obulanaidu S 22205943 326 46 372
23.Nagarjuna Reddy G 22108581 326 46 372
24.Ahmad Shaik (BC-B) 22107243 328 46 374
25.Venkata Prasad Gollamuri 22212937 328 46 374
26.Mohana Rao T (BC-B) 22204975 330 46 376
27.Syam Prakash Reddy M 21014380 334 46 380
28.Mahipal Kurella 22204576 334 46 380
29.Srikrishna D.Garaga 22210388 339 46 385
30.Shaheeda Begum Md. (BC-B) 22209329 341 46 387
31.Gowri Shankara Rao G (BC-D) 20200618 343 46 389
32.Srinivasu M 22210953 348 46 394
33.Sirisha Kunadhi Raju 20615906 302 45 347
34.Veera Prasad G (BC-D) 22212621 308 45 353
35.Venkat Reddy Y 22212785 324 45 369
36. Subba Reddy G 22111119 348 45 393
37.Madhuri Mulugu 20600657 342 45 387
38.Chennaiah K (BC-B) 20912622 341 45 386
39.Pulla Reddy V 22206721 358 45 403
40.Sridevi Vandanapu 22261518 301 45 346
41.Krishna Reddy Male 22100509 335 45 380
42.Vishalakshi Chowdermet (BC-B) 22213989 279 45 324
43.Siva Subrahmanyam P 20702888 330 45 375
44.Raghavendranath C (BC-B) 22206895 307 45 352
45.Srinivas Reddy S 22211194 329 45 374
46.Chandra Lekha Reddy K 22264710 289 45 334
47.Adinarayana Reddy M 20700025 329 45 374
48.Narsi Reddy Gummitha 22205755 325 45 370
49.Radha Naga Padmaja Duggudurthi (BC-A) 20201629 252 45 297
50.Nagalakshmi Tummala 20401084 313 45 358
51.Sudershanam B BC-B 22279051 321 45 366
52.Shivaram Cheganti SC 22209595 293 45 338
53.Prabhakara Rao M (SC) 22206374 336 45 381
54.Krishna Kanth M 20701084 336 45 381
55.Anuradha K Budhavarapu (BC-B)22200459 285 45 330
56. Jayramanaidu Madamanchi 22202809 334 45 379
57.Leela Rani Kota (BC-B) 21011960 297 45 342
58.Sujatha Gajavelli (BC-B) 22211409 277 45 322
59.Vardhanadevi Polanki (BC-B) 21101474 283 45 328
60.Subrahmanyam Muppalla 22211168 328 45 373
61.Pranaheetha Devi G BC-A 22206480 286 44 330
62.Ashok Reddy Y 22200663 338 44 382
63.Jyothi Lakshmi Devi P (BC-B) 21000510 300 44 344
64.Narsi Reddy S 22108692 326 44 370
65.Aparna K 20200094 329 42 371
66.Maheshwar Reddy B 22204567 356 44 400
67.Anupama Muktheswaram (BC-A) 21200127 288 43 331
68.Srilatha Ganta 21701311 340 43 383
69.Suma Thalluri 21701439 318 44 362
70.Uma Rani P 21614543 306 44 350
71.Suvarna P (BC-D) 20308836 324 40 364
72.Venkatesh N (SC) 22281803 316 43 359
73.Anand Kumar P (BC-D) 22200186 332 42 374
74.Suresh Kumar Kollu 22211743 370 43 413
75.Devadas M (SC) 20700543 319 43 362
76.Rajeswari M (BC-D) 20230913 318 42 360
77.Rajender G (BC-A) 22207118 327 42 379
78.Lakshmi V.Namala (SC) 20402725 299 42 341
79.Rajender Reddy N 22207135 347 44 391
80.Sharmila Muttineni 22209469 318 43 361
81.Susheela Konda Gadapa 22211806 310 42 352
82.Ganesh Guntipalli 22201966 342 44 386
83.Rama Lakshmi V.K. (BC-D) 20202961 328 42 370
84.Karimulla Shareif 20500633 321 42 363
85.Venkata Krishna Bokka(BC-B) 21609290 313 43 356
86.Ramaiah Boyapati 22207562 331 43 374
87.NV Raju Gadiraju 22270304 334 44 378
88.Kasaiah Jakkampoodi (BC-A) 21700380 310 40 350
89.Naveen Enumula (SC) 22287675 303 43 346
90.Archana Reddy Edulla 22113574 299 42 341
91.Naga Laxmi Kollu 22205161 331 44 375
92.Radhika Telu (BC-D) 20220285 293 43 336
93.Ramesh Babu Vipparala (SC) 22207853 314 40 354
94. Suresh Kumar Andela (SC) 22211715 301 43 344
95.Bhima Rao G (SC) 22201175 324 44 368
96.Upadhyayanjaneya Satyanarayana 22280416 332 44 376
97.Ravi Sekhar Kumar Yendamuri (BC-A)22208228 341 44 385
98.Venkata Surya Yella Rao 20515151 373 40 413
99.Bala Subrahmanyam G 22200800 351 42 393
100.Venkata Satish Kota 22292154 351 42 393
101.Venkata Ramana Naik R (ST) 21001762 337 43 380
102.Satish Reddy Kalleda 22209109 325 44 369
103.Naga Vara Prasad Adapa 20516205 337 44 381
104.V. Vani Prasad Beela (BC-D) 20301045 331 44 375
105.Kanaka Giri Sastry N.P 22206108 341 44 385
106.David Varaprasad Pamula (SC) 20900210 311 40 351
107. Kalavathi Balepogu 21100426 267 40 317
108.Lakshmidevi K (BC-B) 20600606 283 42 325
109.Prabhakar Reddy B V 22206363 347 40 387
110.Venkata Ramana Rao B (BC-D) 20801555 320 42 362
111.Leela Rani B 20701242 328 43.5 371.5
112.Sivamma P (BC-A) 21215722 269 44 313
113.Sujatha Pujari 21101363 312 42 354
114.Nagarjuna Uppa (BC-B) 22295589 331 40 371
115.Venugopal Reddy Gantla 22213559 335 40 375
116.Nagalakhsmi Ranga 22205230 295 43 338
117.Lakshmi Kodamanchili (BC-B) 20201002 275 44 319
118.Jai Bheem R (SC) 20200706 315 43 358
120.Padmaja Ambati 20717414 311 44 355
121.Venkata Ramesh Nallem 20502659 342 40 382
122.Jairam Satish Babu Rowthu (BC-D)20517421 318 40 358
123.Srinivas Javvadi 22207746 335 40 375
124.Sowjanya Chekka (BC-A) 22259045 245 40 285
125.Sri Kanaka Devi Mendu 22210334 300 42 342
126.Srinivas Palli (BC-D) 22278082 320 44 364
127.Suresh Babu Allangi (ST) 20223036 300 40 340
128.Sivakumari Medikonda (SC) 20801119 271 44 315
129.Srinivasulu Reddy V 20901384 341 44 385
130.Venkata Rao Batchala (BC-D) 20801567 319 42 361
131.Leena A 22204158 301 42 343
132. Aruna Raprolu (BC-B) 20700199 320 44 364
133.Ramkrishna Maram 22207579 343 42 385
134.Brahmananda Reddy M 22264534 334 44 378
135.Vishwanatha Reddy G 22214034 333 44 377
136.Lakshmi D. Nagiri (BC-A) 22203909 313 44 357
137.Indira Banala (BC-B) 22202512 289 43 332
138. Venkata Suneelu T (BC-A) 22213101 339 44 383
139.Chenna Reddy L 22201549 333 42 375
140.Ramesh Reddy A 21201958 334 40 374
141.Venkata Subba Reddy C 22213081 332 40 372
142.Bhaskar M (BC-B) 21016857 310 44 354
143.Hari Krishna Vunnam 21200658 326 40 366
144.Sireesha Juluganti 22209741 318 43 361
145.Phanindra KVS 21301169 322 43 365
146.Srinivasulu Siragam (ST) 22278763 284 40 324
147.Naga Suneetha Rani Chakkera 22295534 282 42 324
148.Bhargava Reddy Patti 22201060 324 41 365
149.Chandrahas K (BC-B) 22201447 308 40 348
150.Satyanarayana Madamanchi 21202202 320 43 363
151.Durga Bhavani G 20509820 288 40 328
152.Venkateswar Reddy V 22281944 358 40 398
153.Kala Sagar T (SC) 22241120 315 42 357
154.Srinivasarao Gunugati 22210940 328 44 372
155.Rama Mohan Baththala 22207632 321 44 365
156.Shyamsundar Palapati (SC) 22276938 283 43 326
157.Karuna Kancherla 22267472 294 43 337
158.Ankama Rao Pilla (OH) 22200388 272 43 315
159.Vijaya Lakshmi Kavalakuntla 22213861 314 40 354
160.Dheeraj Reddy Sadhu 21016523
333 42 375
161.Sita Maha Lakshmi Ch 20615971 306 42 348
162.Sreelatha Meda 22277401 294 42 336
163.Srinivas Reddy T 22210717 326 42 368
164.Vahida Ravi (SC) 22208233 276 40 316
165.Veera Pallam Raju Villa 22212619 360 40 400
166.Venkata Ramana Reddy 21101598 332 40 372
In addition to the 166 candidates, 3 more were awarded marks in excess of 40 (their particulars haven't been furnished by the APPSC). In total, 169 were awarded 80% or more, i.e. 40 marks or more out of 50 in the interviews. This is unprecedented!
No Public Service Commission in India, including the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) awards more than 80% to even a single candidate.
This smacks of irregularities on a phenomenal scale.
Very Low Marks
SHOCKINGLY LOW
Name of the candidate HT No. Marks Obtained TOTAL
450 50 500
1.Naga Mani A (BC-A) 21700611 306 06 312
2.Ramachandra M (SC) 21111173 318 07 325
3.Vinod Rathod (ST) 22213966 329 08 337
4.Venkata Muralidhar Bendi (BC-A) 20111635 312 08 320
5.Venkata Lakshmi K (ST) 20703875 289 08 297
6.Chakravarthi C (SC) 22201336 314 10 354
7.Lavanya Ambati (BC-D) 20723222 310 10 320
8.Sharada G (BC-A) 22109673 275 12 287
9.Vasumathi K (SC) 21112532 256 12 268
10.Rajesh K (SC) 20425761 337 13 350
11.Nagaraju P.A (BC-A) 21000870 313 13 326
12.Satyavathi R (BC-D) 20401942 307 13 320
13.Geetha B (ST) 22107727 267 13 280
14.Anjamma L (ST) 22263247 290 13 303
15.Sreenivasulu G (BC-D) 22210115 358 14 372
16.Ramesh Babu B (BC-B) 21501386 356 14 370
17.Shaleem Raju T (BC-C) 20501861 349 14 363
18.Sambamurthy K (BC-B) 22275411 338 14 352
19.Suresh Kumar M (ST) 22298740 317 14 331
20.Murali Kishore M (BC-A) 21100653 311 14 325
21.Sailaja Kumari N (SC) 22289520 307 14 321
22.Thulasi Thiruveedhi K (BC-D) 21014463 295 14 309
23.Lakshmi Suhasini S (BC-D) 20908878 293 14 307
24.Venkateshwara Rao M 20704070 362 15 377
25.Aruna V (BC-B) 22200540 328 15 343
26.Kalyan Kumar M (SC) 22203089 328 15 343
27.Bharat Kumar K (ST) 22201027 314 15 329
28.Lavanya Sandhya G (SC) 21700489 285 15 300
29.Varalakshmi K (BC-B) 22212529 348 16 364
30.Jayamma Mandula (BC-B) 22202782 323 16 339
31.Vijay Kumar Y (ST) 22214210 315 16 331
32.Sreekanth Naik B (ST) 21219872 322 17 339
33.Madhu Kumar B (BC-A) 22269012 309 17 326
34.Lavanya G (BC-A) 20425240 304 17 321
35.Radhika T (ST) 22272760 278 17 295
36.Kishore Babu D (SC) 22203455 338 18 356
37.Venkata Satyanarayana (BC-B) 20601992 343 18 361
38.Naga Raju M (BC-B) 21100665 359 19 378
39.Narayana Murthy C (BC-A) 20100862 336 19 355
40.Karuna Sree B (BC-B) 21600391 278 19 297
41.Sibhi Chakravarthy S (BC-D) 20202275 366 22 388
42.Srinivasa Rao P 20402229 339 22 361
43.Venkatesham G (BC-D) 22213315 333 22 355
44. Sambasiva Rao T (SC) 20702612 331 22 353
45.Jansydul Shaik (BC-B) 22266823 326 22 348
46. Vinod Kumar J (BC-A) 22213971 354 22 376
47.Anupama V (BC-A) 22200421 295 22 317
48.Sudha D (SC) 20402453 294 22 316
49.Rama Jyothi G (BC-B) 22273571 292 22 314
50.Leelarani P (BC-D) 20201081 280 22 302
51.Madhusudhan P (BC-B) 22204440 360 23 383
52.Veerabhadra Chary T (BC-B) 20801504 337 23 360
53.Padmavibhushan S (BC-A) 20109354 335 23 358
54.Kameswaramma G (BC-B) 22267393 322 23 345
55.Prasantha Vijaya Kumar G (SC) 21001048 308 23 331
56.Krishna D (ST) 22203590 299 23 322
57.Naga Venkata Lakshmi B (SC) 22287360 280 23 303
58. Sudharani C 22211307 357 24 381
59.Bhaskara Rao Y (BC-B) 20200312 344 24 368
60.Venkata Rao M (BC-D) 22292256 340 24 364
61.Mohan K (SC) 21000768 336 24 360
62.Venkatapunaidu K (BC-D) 20301047 330 24 354
63.Kalpana Baby D 20700912 328 24 352
64.Tirupati P (BC-A) 22212064 326 24 350
65. Anand Kumar A (SC) 22284255 322 24 346
66.Gayathri K 20600305 306 24 330
67.Prasanna Lakshmi B (BC-A) 21301210 287 24 311
68.Gopal Krishna Reddy T 20414059 341 25 366
69.Srujan Babu G (BC-D) 21216060 314 25 339
70.Lakshmi Kumari C (BC-B) 20807747 307 25 332
71.Devaraju O (SC) 21623287 307 25 332
72.Venkateshwaramma P (BC-B) 20602064 295 25 320
73.* Naga Syam Kishore Reddy M 22205192 349 14 363
These statistics pertains to those who scored more than 250 out of 450, i.e. more than 55% marks in the written.
Out of 73 who were awarded 25 marks out of 50 in the interviews, 41 (56%) are BCs, 15 SCs, 10 STs, OCs make the rest (7).
Name of the candidate HT No. Marks Obtained TOTAL
450 50 500
1.Naga Mani A (BC-A) 21700611 306 06 312
2.Ramachandra M (SC) 21111173 318 07 325
3.Vinod Rathod (ST) 22213966 329 08 337
4.Venkata Muralidhar Bendi (BC-A) 20111635 312 08 320
5.Venkata Lakshmi K (ST) 20703875 289 08 297
6.Chakravarthi C (SC) 22201336 314 10 354
7.Lavanya Ambati (BC-D) 20723222 310 10 320
8.Sharada G (BC-A) 22109673 275 12 287
9.Vasumathi K (SC) 21112532 256 12 268
10.Rajesh K (SC) 20425761 337 13 350
11.Nagaraju P.A (BC-A) 21000870 313 13 326
12.Satyavathi R (BC-D) 20401942 307 13 320
13.Geetha B (ST) 22107727 267 13 280
14.Anjamma L (ST) 22263247 290 13 303
15.Sreenivasulu G (BC-D) 22210115 358 14 372
16.Ramesh Babu B (BC-B) 21501386 356 14 370
17.Shaleem Raju T (BC-C) 20501861 349 14 363
18.Sambamurthy K (BC-B) 22275411 338 14 352
19.Suresh Kumar M (ST) 22298740 317 14 331
20.Murali Kishore M (BC-A) 21100653 311 14 325
21.Sailaja Kumari N (SC) 22289520 307 14 321
22.Thulasi Thiruveedhi K (BC-D) 21014463 295 14 309
23.Lakshmi Suhasini S (BC-D) 20908878 293 14 307
24.Venkateshwara Rao M 20704070 362 15 377
25.Aruna V (BC-B) 22200540 328 15 343
26.Kalyan Kumar M (SC) 22203089 328 15 343
27.Bharat Kumar K (ST) 22201027 314 15 329
28.Lavanya Sandhya G (SC) 21700489 285 15 300
29.Varalakshmi K (BC-B) 22212529 348 16 364
30.Jayamma Mandula (BC-B) 22202782 323 16 339
31.Vijay Kumar Y (ST) 22214210 315 16 331
32.Sreekanth Naik B (ST) 21219872 322 17 339
33.Madhu Kumar B (BC-A) 22269012 309 17 326
34.Lavanya G (BC-A) 20425240 304 17 321
35.Radhika T (ST) 22272760 278 17 295
36.Kishore Babu D (SC) 22203455 338 18 356
37.Venkata Satyanarayana (BC-B) 20601992 343 18 361
38.Naga Raju M (BC-B) 21100665 359 19 378
39.Narayana Murthy C (BC-A) 20100862 336 19 355
40.Karuna Sree B (BC-B) 21600391 278 19 297
41.Sibhi Chakravarthy S (BC-D) 20202275 366 22 388
42.Srinivasa Rao P 20402229 339 22 361
43.Venkatesham G (BC-D) 22213315 333 22 355
44. Sambasiva Rao T (SC) 20702612 331 22 353
45.Jansydul Shaik (BC-B) 22266823 326 22 348
46. Vinod Kumar J (BC-A) 22213971 354 22 376
47.Anupama V (BC-A) 22200421 295 22 317
48.Sudha D (SC) 20402453 294 22 316
49.Rama Jyothi G (BC-B) 22273571 292 22 314
50.Leelarani P (BC-D) 20201081 280 22 302
51.Madhusudhan P (BC-B) 22204440 360 23 383
52.Veerabhadra Chary T (BC-B) 20801504 337 23 360
53.Padmavibhushan S (BC-A) 20109354 335 23 358
54.Kameswaramma G (BC-B) 22267393 322 23 345
55.Prasantha Vijaya Kumar G (SC) 21001048 308 23 331
56.Krishna D (ST) 22203590 299 23 322
57.Naga Venkata Lakshmi B (SC) 22287360 280 23 303
58. Sudharani C 22211307 357 24 381
59.Bhaskara Rao Y (BC-B) 20200312 344 24 368
60.Venkata Rao M (BC-D) 22292256 340 24 364
61.Mohan K (SC) 21000768 336 24 360
62.Venkatapunaidu K (BC-D) 20301047 330 24 354
63.Kalpana Baby D 20700912 328 24 352
64.Tirupati P (BC-A) 22212064 326 24 350
65. Anand Kumar A (SC) 22284255 322 24 346
66.Gayathri K 20600305 306 24 330
67.Prasanna Lakshmi B (BC-A) 21301210 287 24 311
68.Gopal Krishna Reddy T 20414059 341 25 366
69.Srujan Babu G (BC-D) 21216060 314 25 339
70.Lakshmi Kumari C (BC-B) 20807747 307 25 332
71.Devaraju O (SC) 21623287 307 25 332
72.Venkateshwaramma P (BC-B) 20602064 295 25 320
73.* Naga Syam Kishore Reddy M 22205192 349 14 363
These statistics pertains to those who scored more than 250 out of 450, i.e. more than 55% marks in the written.
Out of 73 who were awarded 25 marks out of 50 in the interviews, 41 (56%) are BCs, 15 SCs, 10 STs, OCs make the rest (7).
Group-II Posts contd.
Asst Dev Officers in A.P. Textiles & Handlooms in Group II (2004)
S.No Name Community HT No MarksWritten
ZONE I
1 Janardhana Rao T ST 22202706 252 37 289
2.Rohini R OC 22208435 310 35 345
ZONE II
1 Anand Kumar A SC 22284255 326 24 350
2 Venkata Lakshmi K ST 20703875 289 8 297
3 Ramaiah Boyapati OC 22207562 331 43 374
ZONE III
1 Pragathi S ST 20717669 268 33 301
2 Sridhar A BC-B 22290519 328 36 364
ZONE IV
1 Krishna D ST 22203590 299 23 322
2 Kalavathi Balepogu OC 21100426 267 40 307
3 Venkata Ramana Reddy OC 21101598 332 40 372
ZONE V
1 Praveen L ST 21511784 394 24 418
2 Sreenivas Rao T SC 22290415 298 24 322
3 Pradeep Kumar M OC 22206413 325 47 372
ZONE VI
1 Chowdeswari BC-B 22201611 313 28 341
2 Madhavi Latha OC 20701290 299
Asst Labour Officer in A.P.Labour Dept Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE II
1 Ravi Sekhar Kumar Yendamuri BC-A 22208228 341 44
ZONE IV
1 Sreekanth Naik B ST 21219872 322 17
2 Suresh Kumar Andela SC 22211715 301 43
ZONE V
1 Anand Reddy M OC 22200193 347 36
2 Satnarayana Reddy A OC 340 340 39
ZONE VI
1 Yadaiah M SC 22205096 298 37
Sub-Registrar Registration and Stamps Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE I
1 Samuel David Raj T BC-C 20209949 279 39
ZONE IV
NO CANDIDATE
Sub-Registrar A.P. Co-Operative Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE I
1 Sarala Kumari K ST 22289718 242 36
2 V.V. Durga Prasada Rao P BC-B 20309390 332 33
ZONE II
1 Uma Maheswari T (W) BC-D 20300951 310 33
2 NO CANDIDATE
3 Pavan Goud B BC-B 22271904 339 34
4 Venkata Rao K ST 20721747 320 29
5 Upadhyayanjaneya Satyanarayana Gajula OC 22280416 332 44
6 Sundara Rao Ch SC 20703495 325 33
7 Suresh Kumar M ST 22298740 317 14
8 Venkata Krishna Bokka BC-B 21609290 313 43
9 Karimulla Shareif OC 20500633 321 42
10 Nageswara Rao R BC-D 20614341 328 34
11 Kesava Kumri S (W) ST 20613338 230 14
12 Vijay Kiran Kumar M BC-D 20617905 337 33
ZONE III
1 Veera Prasad G BC-D 22212621 308 45
2 Srinivasa Reddy P OC 22210929 338 38
3 Gopi Krishna N BC-B 20800261 335 38
ZONE IV
1 Syam Prakash Reddy M OC 21014380 334 46
2 Brahmananda Reddy M OC 22264534 334 44
3 Sivamma P (W) BC-A 21215722 269 44
4. NO CANDIDATE
ZONE V
1 Naidu B BC-D 22270759 331 38
2 Valya Maloth ST 22212448 301 32
3 Sardhar Singh Maloth ST 22289737 296 34
ZONE VI
1 Anjaneyulu B SC 22200375 320 37
2 Vanaja D (W) SC 22280780 295 34
3 Jaya Madhuri J (W) ST 22285831 218 27
4 Praveena D (W) BC-B 22296262 281 36
5 Vijaya P (W) BC-D 20722044 310 34
6 Prasanth Reddy T OC 22206580 335 39
Executive Officer Grade I, A.P. Endowments Dept Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE I
1 Sirisha Kunadhi Raju (W) OC 20615906 302 45
2 Suguna Sivani K (W) SC 20222853 294 37
ZONE II
1 Venkata Durga Bhavani Allu (W) OC 22281233 308 46
2 Sandhya N (W) SC 22297320 291 27
3 Veera Pallam Raju Villa OC 22212619 360 40
4 Veera Chandana R (W) BC-A 20617301 289 27
5 Vinod Kumar J BC-A 22213971 354 22
6 NO CANDIDATE
7 Sri Rama Vara Prasada Rao D SC 22211047 318 38
8 Radha S (W) ST 20423470 222 34
9 Hari Surya Prakash V BC-B 20500462 341 32
ZONE III
1 Subhadra T OC 20733377 354 38
2 Sirisha V (W) SC 20912216 292 29
3 Venkateshwara Rao M OC 20704070 362 15
4 Anupama V (W) BC-A 22200421 295 22
ZONE IV
1 Kameswaramma G (W) BC-B 22267393 322 23
2 Sailaja Kumari N (W) SC 22289520 307 14
3 Adisesha Naidu K OC 21200055 349 38
4 Prasanna Lakshmi B (W) BC-A 21301210 287 24
5 Chandra Mouli B OC 22201356 348 37
6 NO CANDIDATE
7 Ramanjaneyulu M SC 22273897 296 38
8 Vani K (W) ST 21202739 225 18
9 Thimma Naidu M OC 21202663 347 36
ZONE V
1 Anjani Devi K (W) OC 22200378 319 26
ZONE VI
1 Soujanya Rao (W) OC 20402063 299 48
Executive Officers Grade II A.P. Panchayat Raj Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE I
1 Sita Maha Lakshmi Ch (W) OC 20615971 306 42
2 Venkata Subba Rao M OC 20602011 336 35
3 Lakshmi Prasanna V (W) OC 22203935 295 26
4 Trinadha Rao R BC-D 20311263 334 33
5 Srinivasa Rao R BC-D 20300831 337 26
ZONE II
1 Srinivasa Rao K OC 22290828 332 39
2 Narayana Murthy C BC-A 20100862 336 19
3 Particulars to be furnished later
4 Dayanand Rathod M ST 22265207 303 35
5 Durga Prasad P OC 20500335 327 38
6 Sunil Kumar V BC-D 20402488 322 38
7 Radha Naga Padmaja Duggudurthi (W)BC-A 20201629 252 45
8 Nagalakshmi Tummala (W) OC 20401084 313 45
9 Rajesh K SC 20425761 337 13
10 Naga Syam Kishore Reddy M OC 22205192 349 14
11 Ankama Rao Pilla OH 22200388 272 43
12 Veera Sivaiah C OC 20610956 328 35
ZONE III
1 Sambasiva Rao T SC 20702612 331 22
ZONE IV
1 Janardhan A BC-D 21621073 176 34
2 Venkata Renuka C (W) BC-B 22213035 303 38
3 Venkata Ramana K OC 21202806 330 38
4 Mujafir Rahim Patha C BC-B 22205000 310 39
5 Eeshwara Reddy Katappagari OC 21200496 326 46
6 Padmavathy B (W) BC-A 21012809 260 36
Jr. Employment Officer in Employment & Training Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE I
1 Vahida Ravi (W) SC 22208233 276 40
ZONE II
1 Ratna Kumari M (W) OC 20501590 326 38
ZONE V
1 Naga Mani A BC-A 21700611 306 6
S.No Name Community HT No MarksWritten
ZONE I
1 Janardhana Rao T ST 22202706 252 37 289
2.Rohini R OC 22208435 310 35 345
ZONE II
1 Anand Kumar A SC 22284255 326 24 350
2 Venkata Lakshmi K ST 20703875 289 8 297
3 Ramaiah Boyapati OC 22207562 331 43 374
ZONE III
1 Pragathi S ST 20717669 268 33 301
2 Sridhar A BC-B 22290519 328 36 364
ZONE IV
1 Krishna D ST 22203590 299 23 322
2 Kalavathi Balepogu OC 21100426 267 40 307
3 Venkata Ramana Reddy OC 21101598 332 40 372
ZONE V
1 Praveen L ST 21511784 394 24 418
2 Sreenivas Rao T SC 22290415 298 24 322
3 Pradeep Kumar M OC 22206413 325 47 372
ZONE VI
1 Chowdeswari BC-B 22201611 313 28 341
2 Madhavi Latha OC 20701290 299
Asst Labour Officer in A.P.Labour Dept Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE II
1 Ravi Sekhar Kumar Yendamuri BC-A 22208228 341 44
ZONE IV
1 Sreekanth Naik B ST 21219872 322 17
2 Suresh Kumar Andela SC 22211715 301 43
ZONE V
1 Anand Reddy M OC 22200193 347 36
2 Satnarayana Reddy A OC 340 340 39
ZONE VI
1 Yadaiah M SC 22205096 298 37
Sub-Registrar Registration and Stamps Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE I
1 Samuel David Raj T BC-C 20209949 279 39
ZONE IV
NO CANDIDATE
Sub-Registrar A.P. Co-Operative Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE I
1 Sarala Kumari K ST 22289718 242 36
2 V.V. Durga Prasada Rao P BC-B 20309390 332 33
ZONE II
1 Uma Maheswari T (W) BC-D 20300951 310 33
2 NO CANDIDATE
3 Pavan Goud B BC-B 22271904 339 34
4 Venkata Rao K ST 20721747 320 29
5 Upadhyayanjaneya Satyanarayana Gajula OC 22280416 332 44
6 Sundara Rao Ch SC 20703495 325 33
7 Suresh Kumar M ST 22298740 317 14
8 Venkata Krishna Bokka BC-B 21609290 313 43
9 Karimulla Shareif OC 20500633 321 42
10 Nageswara Rao R BC-D 20614341 328 34
11 Kesava Kumri S (W) ST 20613338 230 14
12 Vijay Kiran Kumar M BC-D 20617905 337 33
ZONE III
1 Veera Prasad G BC-D 22212621 308 45
2 Srinivasa Reddy P OC 22210929 338 38
3 Gopi Krishna N BC-B 20800261 335 38
ZONE IV
1 Syam Prakash Reddy M OC 21014380 334 46
2 Brahmananda Reddy M OC 22264534 334 44
3 Sivamma P (W) BC-A 21215722 269 44
4. NO CANDIDATE
ZONE V
1 Naidu B BC-D 22270759 331 38
2 Valya Maloth ST 22212448 301 32
3 Sardhar Singh Maloth ST 22289737 296 34
ZONE VI
1 Anjaneyulu B SC 22200375 320 37
2 Vanaja D (W) SC 22280780 295 34
3 Jaya Madhuri J (W) ST 22285831 218 27
4 Praveena D (W) BC-B 22296262 281 36
5 Vijaya P (W) BC-D 20722044 310 34
6 Prasanth Reddy T OC 22206580 335 39
Executive Officer Grade I, A.P. Endowments Dept Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE I
1 Sirisha Kunadhi Raju (W) OC 20615906 302 45
2 Suguna Sivani K (W) SC 20222853 294 37
ZONE II
1 Venkata Durga Bhavani Allu (W) OC 22281233 308 46
2 Sandhya N (W) SC 22297320 291 27
3 Veera Pallam Raju Villa OC 22212619 360 40
4 Veera Chandana R (W) BC-A 20617301 289 27
5 Vinod Kumar J BC-A 22213971 354 22
6 NO CANDIDATE
7 Sri Rama Vara Prasada Rao D SC 22211047 318 38
8 Radha S (W) ST 20423470 222 34
9 Hari Surya Prakash V BC-B 20500462 341 32
ZONE III
1 Subhadra T OC 20733377 354 38
2 Sirisha V (W) SC 20912216 292 29
3 Venkateshwara Rao M OC 20704070 362 15
4 Anupama V (W) BC-A 22200421 295 22
ZONE IV
1 Kameswaramma G (W) BC-B 22267393 322 23
2 Sailaja Kumari N (W) SC 22289520 307 14
3 Adisesha Naidu K OC 21200055 349 38
4 Prasanna Lakshmi B (W) BC-A 21301210 287 24
5 Chandra Mouli B OC 22201356 348 37
6 NO CANDIDATE
7 Ramanjaneyulu M SC 22273897 296 38
8 Vani K (W) ST 21202739 225 18
9 Thimma Naidu M OC 21202663 347 36
ZONE V
1 Anjani Devi K (W) OC 22200378 319 26
ZONE VI
1 Soujanya Rao (W) OC 20402063 299 48
Executive Officers Grade II A.P. Panchayat Raj Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE I
1 Sita Maha Lakshmi Ch (W) OC 20615971 306 42
2 Venkata Subba Rao M OC 20602011 336 35
3 Lakshmi Prasanna V (W) OC 22203935 295 26
4 Trinadha Rao R BC-D 20311263 334 33
5 Srinivasa Rao R BC-D 20300831 337 26
ZONE II
1 Srinivasa Rao K OC 22290828 332 39
2 Narayana Murthy C BC-A 20100862 336 19
3 Particulars to be furnished later
4 Dayanand Rathod M ST 22265207 303 35
5 Durga Prasad P OC 20500335 327 38
6 Sunil Kumar V BC-D 20402488 322 38
7 Radha Naga Padmaja Duggudurthi (W)BC-A 20201629 252 45
8 Nagalakshmi Tummala (W) OC 20401084 313 45
9 Rajesh K SC 20425761 337 13
10 Naga Syam Kishore Reddy M OC 22205192 349 14
11 Ankama Rao Pilla OH 22200388 272 43
12 Veera Sivaiah C OC 20610956 328 35
ZONE III
1 Sambasiva Rao T SC 20702612 331 22
ZONE IV
1 Janardhan A BC-D 21621073 176 34
2 Venkata Renuka C (W) BC-B 22213035 303 38
3 Venkata Ramana K OC 21202806 330 38
4 Mujafir Rahim Patha C BC-B 22205000 310 39
5 Eeshwara Reddy Katappagari OC 21200496 326 46
6 Padmavathy B (W) BC-A 21012809 260 36
Jr. Employment Officer in Employment & Training Sub Service in Group II (2004)
ZONE I
1 Vahida Ravi (W) SC 22208233 276 40
ZONE II
1 Ratna Kumari M (W) OC 20501590 326 38
ZONE V
1 Naga Mani A BC-A 21700611 306 6
Group-II Services
DEPUTY TEHSILDARS IN A.P. C.C.L.A. SUB SERVICE
Name of the candidate HT No. Marks Obtained TOTAL
450 50 500
ZONE-I
1.Sudha Sagar S (BC-A) 20101552 348 35 383
2.Aparna K 20200094 329 42 371
3.Srinivasarao Y 20300823 353 39 392
4.Ambedkar T (ST) 20230636 255 39 294
5.Rama Lakshmi V.K. (BC-D) 20202961 328 42 370
6.Lokeswara Rao V.K.M (BC-B) 20202968 346 36 382
7.Venkata Ramana V (BC-D) 22281377 356 34 390
ZONE-II
1.Bhima Rao G (SC) 22201175 324 44 368
2.Venkata Surya Yella Rao 20515151 373 40 413
3.Madhusudhana Rao A (BC-A) 20218968 341 38 379
4.Madhuri Mulugu 20600657 342 45 387
5.Gangaraju M (OH) 20500403 308 22 330
6.Nagarjuna Reddy V 20501048 361 39 400
7.Radhika T (ST) 22272760 278 17 295
8.Devaki L (BC-D) 20500306 328 33 361
9.Venkata Satyanarayana (BC-B) 20601992 343 18 361
10.Srinivasu M 22210953 348 46 394
11.Sridhar N (SC) 22210283 330 32 362
12.Bala Subrahmanyam G 22200800 351 42 393
13.Swarna Latha K (BC-D) 22211898 305 46 351
14.Sivamma Laka Mani 22209835 335 26 361
15.Sridevi Busi (SC) 22210227 308 36 344
16.Subba Reddy G 22111119 348 45 393
17.Sreenu Vennela (BC-D) 22210145 327 38 365
18.Venkata Satish Kota 22292154 351 42 393
ZONE - III
1.Venkata Siva Kemeswararao S 20801582 365 34 399
2.Venkata Ramana Naik R (ST) 21001762 337 43 380
3.Sirisha M 20702838 345 36 381
4.Mohana Rao T (BC-B) 22204975 330 46 376
5.Chennaiah U (SC) 20800188 359 36 395
6. Venkateshwarulu K 20801676 358 35 393
7.Sudharani C 22211307 357 24 381
8.Sreenivasulu G (BC-D) 22210115 358 14 372
9.Ramesh Naidu K 20702377 354 38 392
10.Praveen Kumar T (SC) 20702014 354 30 384
11.Phaneendra Babu VSG 22206288 354 34 388
12.Venkata Ramana Rao B (BC-D) 20801555 320 42 362
13.Leela Rani B 20701242 328 43.5 371.5
14.Sujatha G (BC-A) 20703460 304 28 332
15.Venkateshwarulu G 22213481 352 35 387
16.Prashanthi T (SC) 20702007 288 35 323
17.Chennaiah K (BC-B) 20912622 341 45 386
18.Lakshmi Kumari C (BC-B) 20807747 307 25 332
19.Aruna Raprolu (BC-B) 20700199 320 44 364
20.Srinivasulu Reddy V 20901384 341 44 385
21.Vijay Bhaskar B (SC) 20704158 338 38 376
22.Ramkrishna Maram 22207579 343 42 385
23.Venkata Suneelu T (BC-A) 22213101 339 44 383
24.Padmadevi C 20701798 322 33 355
25.Anil Kumar G (OH) 22200282 313 36 349
ZONE- IV
1. Sailaja P 21301517 346 33 379
2.Naga Raju M (BC-B) 21100665 359 19 378
3.Sateesh K (OH) 21711483 324 35 359
4.Sridevi T (SC) 20423854 312 28 340
5.Madhusudhan Reddy Y 21201108 357 47 404
6.Gowri Shankara Rao G (BC-D) 20200618 343 46 389
7.Sireesha Juluganti 22209741 318 43 361
8.Kala Sagar T (SC) 22241120 315 42 357
9.Pulla Reddy V 22206721 358 45 403
10.Rama Mohan Baththala 22207632 321 44 365
11.Ram Bhupal Reddy O 21100930 362 39 401
12.Premantha Kumar S (BC-D) 20900947 331 33 364
13.Vijaya Lakshmi Kavalakuntla 22213861 314 40 354
14.Sivaramudu R (SC) 22290260 312 35 347
15.Maheshwar Reddy B 22204567 356 44 400
16.Sunitha Bai R (BC-B) 22211574 310 38 348
17.Vishwanath Challa 21202951 357 39 396
18.Kalavathi A 21011623 317 33 340
19.Vijaya Kumari P (SC) 22292543 297 28 327
20.Sreenivasulu T 21219900 358 36 394
21.Anupama Muktheswaram (BC-A)21200127 288 43 331
22.Vishnu Vardhan Reddy S 21202945 353 38 391
ZONE- V
1. Narasimha Rao G (BC-D) 21301517 346 33 379
2.Srilatha Ganta 21701311 340 43 383
3.Satyal Pal Reddy K (OH) 22209140 342 25 367
4.Madhusudhan P (BC-B) 22204440 360 23 383
5.Lokeshwara Rao V 22204202 360 34 394
6.Ashok Chakravarthy S (SC) 22200641 326 38 364
7.Gangaiah B (BC-B) 21500347 359 35 394
8.Suma Thalluri 21701439 318 44 362
9.Nagarajamma D (SC) 22270507 295 36 331
10.Sadanandam Pittala (BC-B) 21501500 367 26 393
11.Ramamurthy V (BC-D) 22207931 342 28 370
12.Raju S 22207334 358 33 391
13.Srinivas Rao G (BC-A) 21518093 329 34 363
14.Uma Rani P 21614543 306 44 350
15. Suvarna P (BC-D) 20308836 324 40 364
16.Venkatesh N (SC) 22281803 316 43 359
17.Kiran Prakash S (BC-B) 22294659 355 35 390
18.Srinivas N (BC-B) 21502021 349 32 381
19.Mangilal M (ST) 21619190 314 36 350
20.Komal Reddy C 22267897 345 44 389
21.Narayana K (SC) 22270899 317 32 349
22.Sunitha R (BC-B) 22211561 320 27 347
23.Suresh K (BC-A) 22211666 333 29 362
24.Madhu D (BC-B) 22204373 354 33 387
25. Srivani Sirimalla (BC-B) 21502066 294 42 336
26.Praveen Kumar Reddy C 22206639 346 40 386
27.Hari Krishna P (ST) 22202327 318 32 350
ZONE-VI
1.Chinna Appalanaidu P (BC-A) 20100201 343 36 379
2.Rama Krishna K 22207457 321 33 354
3.Anand Kumar P (BC-D) 22200186 332 42 374
4.Suresh Kumar Kollu 22211743 370 43 413
5.Devadas M (SC) 20700543 319 43 362
6.Zubedunnisa Begum Md. (VH) 21609448 152 8 160
7.Rajeswari M (BC-D) 20230913 318 42 360
8.Padma Priya P 22206024 358 38 396
9.Rajender G (BC-A) 22207118 327 42 379
10.Venkat Reddy Koppula 22212793 349 47 396
11.Lakshmi V. Namala (SC) 20402725 299 42 341
12.Koteshwara Rao V (BC-B) 22299172 338 33 371
13.Sanjay Kumar M (BC-B) 22208769 338 39 377
14.Shiva Kumar K (ST) 22276757 319 34 353
15.Rajender Reddy N 22207135 347 44 391
16.Anil Kumar V (SC) 22200252 333 28 361
17.Subramanyam D 21202484 351 39 390
18.Ram Prasad Mandagiri (BC-B) 20702209 319 48 367
19.Sharmila Muttineni 22209469 318 43 361
20. HH UNFILLED
21.Ram Reddy P 22207400 353 36 389
22.Yadiah Nimma (ST) 22282965 303 48 351
23.Susheela Konda Gadapa 22211806 310 42 352
24.Ahmad Shaik (BC-B) 22107243 328 46 374
25.Shaheeda Begum Md. (BC-B) 22209329 341 46 387
26.Venkatesh T 22213282 355 32 387
27.Venkata Lakshmi Potturi 21400493 301 46 347
28.Ramakrishna P (BC-D) 22273787 330 37 367
29.Ganesh Guntipalli 22201966 342 44 386
30.Bavaiah (SC) 22200937 315 38 353
31.Dhamodar Rao K 22201744 350 33 383
32.Venkanna M (BC-D) 22212741 331 35 366
33.Sridevi Vandanapu 22261518 301 45 346
34.Saraswathi S (BC-A) 22297431 278 36 314
35.Ashok Reddy Y 22200663 338 44 382
36.N R Saritha Nimma (SC) 22295491 307 26 333
37.Krishna Reddy M 22100509 335 45 380
38.Vishalakshi Chowdermet (BC-B) 22213989 279 45 324
39.Aruna V (BC-B) 22200540 328 15 343
40. Mahipal Kurella 22204576 334 46 380
41.Sudershan Y (SC) 22211216 309 37 346
42.NV Raju Gadiraju 22270304 334 44 378
43.Kasaiah Jakkampoodi (BC-A) 21700380 310 40 350
44.Nirmala Allam (BC-A) 22205898 310 32 342
45.Yadgiri A (BC-A) (OH) 21302265 307 32 339
46.Venkat Reddy Kunchala 22212786 342 35 377
47.Geetha B (ST) 22107727 267 13 280
48.Anitha Karra 22200297 304 38 342
49.Rajendhar Goud L (BC-B) 22207134 343 30 373
50.Saidulu P (BC-B) 22208600 345 32 377
51.Naveen Enumula (SC) 22287675 303 43 346
52.Sridhar D 22277714 346 30 376
53.Nirmala N (BC-D) 22205906 300 37 337
54.Archana Reddy Edulla 22113574 299 42 341
55.Sudha L (SC) 22298492 294 39 343
56.Srinivas Reddy Y 22210733 340 36 376
57.Naveen Marrapu (BC-D) 22287672 318 47 365
58.Naga Laxmi Kollu 22205161 331 44 375
59.Raveendar D (BC-A) 22208091 319 27 346
60. Jayamma Mandula (BC-B) 22202782 323 16 339
61.Krishnaiah Chepuri (SC) 22203726 308 37 345
DY. TAHSILDAR IN AP SUB SERVICE
ZONE-II
1.Narayana B (HH) 21800465 178 15 193
EXTENSION OFFICERS (RD) PANCHAYAT RAJ
ZONE- I
1.Srinivasa Chary S (BC-B) 21701340 326 35 361
2.Ramakrishna P 22207598 339 35 374
3.Radhika Telu (BC-D) 20220285 293 43 336
4.Sanyasi Raja Prakash P 20202100 335 32 367
ZONE- II
1.Bheemesh I K. (OH) 22201165 300 22 322
2.Padma Jyothi K 20401206 302 34 336
3.Kishore Babu D (SC) 22203455 338 18 356
4.Chinnarao C (BC-D) 22201581 318 33 351
5.Ashok Kumar B (SC) 22200643 319 36 355
6.Manikyam M 20400913 312 32 344
7.Rambabu J (BC-A) 22288915 337 24 361
ZONE- III
1.Ganga Mohan B (OH) 21805349 297 28 326
2.Satya Kumar E (SC) 20719221 321 36 355
3.Srinivasa Rao K (BC-B) 20703235 335 33 368
4.Ramesh Babu Vipparala (SC) 22207853 314 40 354
5.Praveena Kumari N (BC-B) 20619105 289 34 323
6.Veerabhadra Chary T (BC-B) 20801504 337 23 360
7.Kalpana Baby D 20700912 328 24 352
8.Siva Subrahmanyam P 20702888 330 45 375
ZONE- IV
1.Surendra Nath P (BC-A) 20901544 324 38 362
2.Sateesh Kumar M (BC-B) 21800795 331 33 364
3. VH (W) NO CANDIDATE
4.Prathyusha K (SC) 22288163 285 33 318
5.Pullaiah Y (SC) 21214389 300 34 334
6.Raghavendranath C (BC-B) 22206895 307 45 352
7. HH NO CANDIDATE
8.Sarada Sajjanam G (BC-B) 22208894 295 32 337
9.Srinivas Reddy S 22211194 329 45 374
10.Jyothi Lakshmi Devi P (BC-B) 21000510 300 44 344
11.Chandra Lekha Reddy K 22264710 289 45 334
12.Aruna V (BC-D) 21000062 293 38 331
ZONE-V
1.Adinarayana Reddy M 20700025 329 45 374
2.Chinna Nageshwara Rao R( BC-A) 20700484 325 33 358
3.David Varaprasad Pamula (SC) 20900210 311 40 351
4.Obulanaidu S 22205943 326 46 372
5.Pavan Gudla (BC-B) 22271903 340 27 367
6.Ramesh Budhe (BC-B) 21515635 327 39 366
7. Devaraju O (SC) 21623287 307 25 332
8.Venkateshwar Rao M 22213326 330 33 363
9.Naganath A (BC-D) 22205271 323 33 356
10.Bhikshapathi B 22201171 323 39 362
11.Ramadevi J (SC) 22273698 282 39 321
ZONE- VI
1.Swarnalatha M (BC-B) 22101568 281 36 317
2.Srikanth Reddy B 22210375 336 37 373
3.Srinivas Ambati (BC-B) 22210673 331 35 366
4.Raghava Rao 22206872 336 36 372
5.Rama Jyothi G (BC-B) 22273571 292 22 314
6.Narsi Reddy Gummitha 22205755 325 45 370
7. VH NO CANDIDATE
8.Satish Reddy Kalleda 22209109 325 44 369
ASST. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICERS
ZONE- I
1.Aravind Babu V (BC-A) 20700188 333 33 366
2.Rajeshwari K (BC-D) 20300515 319 39 358
3.Satyanarayana S (OH) 20221673 302 39 341
4.Sibhi Chakravarthy S (BC-D) 20202275 366 22 388
5.Rama Krishna Vendrapu (BC-D) 20201732 324 46 370
6.Naga Vara Prasad Adapa 20516205 337 44 381
7.Padmavibhushan S (BC-A) 20109354 335 23 358
8.Madhavi Vasantha (BC-A) 20201104 322 36 358
9.Siva Sankar L (SC) 22209812 322 32 354
10.V.Vani Prasad Beela (BC-D) 20301045 331 44 375
11.Bhaskara Rao Y (BC-B) 20200312 344 24 368
ZONE- II
1.Suresh Gadde (SC) 20720794 323 36 359
2. VH NON LOCAL NO CANDIDATE
3.Revathi V L YN P (BC-D) 20201980 323 32 355
4.Sowmya N 20601478 324 37 361
5.Lavanya G (BC-A) 20425240 304 17 321
6.Krishna Tataji T (HH) 20517561 164 16 180
7.Joya G (SC) 20400588 289 35 324
8.Kanaka Giri Sastry N.P 22206108 341 44 385
9.Vara Lakshmi K (BC-B) 20402834 305 32 337
ZONE-III
1.Varalakshmi K (BC-B) 22212529 348 16 364
2.Manjula A (SC) 21700551 296 26 322
3.Bharat Kumar K (ST) 22201027 314 15 329
4.Kaniki Reddy M (OH) 21400117 288 28 316
5.Parijatha B (SC) 22206178 285 36 321
6.Padmanabhaiah N 21100795 358 25 383
7.Ravanamma G (BC-D) 20702436 299 29 328
8.Prabhakara Rao M (SC) 22206374 336 45 381
9. HH NO CANDIDATE
10.Ramarao M (SC) 20718348 327 33 360
11.Anjamma L (ST) 22263247 290 13 303
12.Krishna Kanth M 20701084 336 45 381
13.Lakshmidevi K (BC-B) 20600606 283 42 325
ZONE-IV
1.Mohan K (SC) 21000768 336 24 360
2.Ravi Shankar M (BC-A) 21202016 370 26 396
3.Sridevi K (BC-D) 20202439 313 32 345
4.Prabhakar Reddy B V 22206363 347 40 387
5.Mohan Kumar Bharath (BC-A) 21201245 328 37 365
6.Naveen Kumar Reddy N 22205821 348 38 386
7.Sailaja Y (SC) 22208616 288 27 315
8. VH NO CANDIDATE
9 Sudershanam B BC-B 22279051 321 45 366
10 Chakra Naik S ST 22201329 306 30 336
11 Meghanath S OC 22204927 349 35 384
12 Satyam Dasanna Giri SC 22209160 316 32 348
13 Suneetha Singam Reddy OC 22211494 345 37 382
ZONE V
1 Pranaheetha Devi G BC-A 22206480 286 44 330
2 Govardhan P OC 22202198 347 35 382
3 Asha A OC 22263628 315 39 354
4 Devendhar N OC 22201731 348 33 381
5 Ashok K SC 22263654 296 39 335
6 Krishna Kumar N M OC 21700600 345 35 380
7 Tirupati P BC-A 22212064 326 24 350
8 Asia Sulthana OC 21600093 308 39 347
ZONE VI
1 VH (W) No Candidate
2? Shivaram Cheganti SC 22209595 293 45 338
2 ? Sujatha K OC 20703445 319 37 356
3? PurnaChandra Kala N HH 20100971 209 13 222
4 Uma Maheshwara Rao K BC-B 22212189 358 38 396
5 Nagaraja Naik K ST 22205282 316 34 350
6 Sujatha Pujari OC 21101363 312 42 354
7 Nagarjuna Uppala BC-B 22295589 331 40 371
8 Murali S OC 22270132 367 28 395
9 Dasaratha P BC-B 22100214 346 37 383
10 Kranthi Boda BC-A 22203577 304 48 352
11 Hanumatha Rao K BC-D 22107806 321 39 360
12 Shiva Datta G P BC-B 22209541 343 33 376
13 Ramesh Babu N SC 22296821 300 38 338
14 Venugopal Reddy Gantla OC 22213559 335 40 375
15 Jayaram V BC-D 22266918 325 34 359
16 Nagalakshmi Ranga OC 22205230 295 43 338
17 Anand Gayatri K BC-A 22000013 273 27 300
18 Lenin Gaddam OC 22100561 349 25 374
19 Sandhya Rani E SC 22275540 289 39 328
20 Santosh Kumar M OC 22208875 336 38 374
21 Sujatha Gajavelli BC-B 22211409 277 45 322
MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-III
MULTI ZONE-I
1.Bhanupratap A OH 20700348 354 29 383
MULTI ZONE-II
1.Surender V (BC-B) 22101542 366 33 399
2.Jagan D (ST) 22202572 315 39 354
EXCISE SUB INSPECTORS
ZONE-I
1.Chaitanya M (SC) 20100173 249 06 255
2.Seshu Kumari D (BC-D) 20202256 305 36 341
3.Nagaiah K (BC-B) 22100685 325 35 380
4.Pallavi K. L 20618659 299 33 332
5. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
6.Mallikarjuna Rao K 20600669 340 33 373
7.Ramachandra Rao P (BC-A) 20109792 324 32 356
8.Gayathri K 20600305 306 24 330
9.Srinivasa Rao M (BC-D) 20222612 326 46 372
10.Venkat Reddy M 20704032 331 37 368
11.K. Manju Khetavat (ST) 22245485 208 34 242
12.Khushbu K 22267687 300 30 330
13.Bala Narasimha C (BC-B) 21500136 320 38 358
14.YNBR Kumar K 20722250 342 26 368
15.Srinivasu G (SC) 20419554 311 35 346
16.Jayarami Reddy G 20715355 330 37 367
17.Leelarani P (BC-D) 20201081 280 22 302
18.Indira Devi K 20200671 285 35 320
19. SC (W) NO CANDIDATE
20.Ravi Kiran J (BC-D) 20300606 340 26 366
21.Narasimha Murthy B (BC-D) 20219616 323 32 355
22.Ravi Kumar V 22208177 333 33 366
23.Madhu Kumar B (BC-A) 22269012 309 17 326
24.Lakshmi Kodamanchili (BC-B) 20201002 275 44 319
25.Kameshwara Rao K (SC) 20108373 295 32 327
26.Venkata Rao M (BC-D) 22292256 340 24 364
27.Satish Kumar G (BC-B) 20300681 329 27 356
28. ST NO CANDIDATE
29.Srinivasa Rao Pinniti (BC-D) 90300003 317 46 363
30.Chakravarthi C (SC) 22201336 314 10 354
31.Rajeshwari N 22207234 343 30 373
32.Venkata Muralidhar Bendi (BC-A)20111635 312 08 320
33.Srinivasa Rao P 20402229 339 22 361
34. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
35.Sreenivas S 20202387 325 36 361
36. ST NO CANDIDATE
37.Kiran Manjeshwari B 20200876 274 33 307
38.VVS Sehkar Babu V (BC-B) 20101743 311 35 346
39.Jai Bheem R (SC) 20200706 315 43 358
40. SC (W) NO CANDIDATE
41.Upendra L (BC-B) 22291766 322 35 357
42.Venkatapunaidu K (BC-D) 20301047 330 24 354
43.Anuradha Devi L (BC-D) 22200458 280 27 307
44.Rajeshwari C (SC) 22207233 248 33 381
ZONE- II
1.Satyavathi R (BC-D) 20401942 307 13 320
2.Nagavalli I (SC) 20415841 267 39 306
3.Padmaja Ambati 20717414 311 44 355
4.Guruvaiah B (BC-B) 22202263 331 32 363
5.Srikrishna D. Garaga 22210388 339 46 385
6.Sudha D (SC) 20402453 294 22 316
7.Venkata Ramesh Nallem 20502659 342 40 382
8.Jairam Satish Babu Rowthu (BC-D)20517421 318 40 358
9.Lakshmi C 20400766 322 30 352
10.Srinivas P (SC) 22290639 320 36 356
11.Srinivas Javvadi 22207746 335 40 375
12.Venkatesham G (BC-D) 22213315 333 22 355
13.Surya Prakash Rao M 20420233 342 28 370
14.Sridhar K (BC-B) 20501994 321 36 357
15.Girija Satya Kumari P (BC-D) 20401257 316 33 349
16.Varala Raju B (SC) 20229756 317 33 350
17.Peddi Raju Ravi B 20500221 331 39 370
18.Jayasree A (BC-B) 20800331 291 38 319
19. VVSN Varma 22212419 330 38 368
20.Srivallari C 22211072 308 34 342
21.Naga Venkata Lakshmi B (SC) 22287360 280 23 303
22.Gopal Krishna Reddy T 20414059 341 25 366
23.Sowjanya Chekka (BC-A) 22259045 245 40 285
24.Mani Kantha Reddy S 20400907 330 36 366
25.Sri Kanaka Devi Mendu 22210334 300 42 342
26.Vidya Sudhahar K (SC) 20602097 313 37 350
27.Madhavi O (ST) 20600641 196 32 228
28.Ramesh Shaik (BC-B) 20501543 329 36 365
29.Venkateshwaramma P (BC-B) 20602064 295 25 320
30.Vasudeva Rao K 22212580 329 35 364
31.Tarangini C (BC-B) 20402637 301 36 337
32.Sreenivas J 21101222 328 36 364
33.Shaleem Raju T (BC-C) 20501861 349 14 363
34.Srinivas Palli (BC-D) 22278082 320 44 364
35.Nixon N (SC) 22205926 313 36 349
36.Arunamma C (BC-B) 22200595 307 28 335
ZONE- III
1.Lavanya Ambati (BC-D) 20723222 310 10 320
2.Vinay Kumar K 22213947 343 37 380
3.Anuradha K Budhavarapu (BC-B) 22200459 285 45 330
4.Veeranjaneyulu G 20703826 345 32 377
5.Suresh Babu Allangi (ST) 20223036 300 40 340
6.Rangamai Nagam (BC-D) 20717938 313 34 347
7.Kishore B (BC-B) 20701004 331 33 364
8.Abdul Zaleel Shaik Md. 20900599 342 35 377
9.Sivakumari Medikonda (SC) 20801119 271 44 315
10.Narahari Rao Ravipati 22205499 327 47 374
11.Venkata Rao Batchala (BC-D) 20801567 319 42 361
12.Leena A 22204158 301 42 343
13.Vijay Kumar P (SC) 20724450 325 29 354
14.Venkata Prasad Gollamuri 22212937 328 46 374
15.Vijaya Bhaskara Rao R (BC-D) 20801702 317 35 352
16.Bujji Babu K 22264580 333 38 371
17.Venkateshwara Rao V (BC-B) 20617746 325 32 357
18.Prabhavati K 20725603 303 36 339
19.Ramesh M (SC) 20800908 310 37 347
20.Rama Rao S 22207691 333 38 371
21. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
22.Kalyan P (BC-D) 22203087 342 28 370
ZONE- IV
1.Siva Krishnamma P 21202245 321 27 348
2.Mohan Reddy E 22204971 345 39 384
3.Ramamohan Gondi (BC-D) 21100958 329 33 363
4. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
5. BC-A (W) NO CANDIDATE
6.Krishna Kumar B (BC-D) 22268202 321 38 359
7.Veera Reddy U 22212624 343 37 380
8.Jawahar Babu P (SC) 22202731 312 33 345
9.Jayramanaidu Madamanchi 22202809 334 45 379
10.Sivasagar G (BC-D) 21316149 311 39 350
11.Leela Rani Kota (BC-B) 21011960 297 45 342
12.Lalitha Devi B (BC-A) 21313313 264 34 298
13.Gurunatha Reddy P 21200631 342 37 379
14.Lavanya I (SC) 22204038 275 27 302
15.Venkata Pavan Kumar Y 22281329 343 35 378
16.Gouri M (BC-B) 21000379 267 37 304
17.Neeraja Sriyapu Reddy 22205860 291 48 339
18.Mahesh Kumar S 22269275 340 38 378
19.Kalyan Kumar M (SC) 22203089 328 15 343
20.Vishwanatha Reddy G 22214034 333 44 377
21.Lakshmi D. Nagiri (BC-A) 22203909 313 44 357
22.Indira Banala (BC-B) 22202512 289 43 332
23.Dheeraj Reddy Sadhu 21016523 333 42 375
24.Chenna Reddy L 22201549 333 42 375
25.Urukundamma Y (ST) 21302014 238 27 265
26.Sarala Devi S (BC-B) 22275811 295 36 331
27.Somasekhar D (BC-B) 21202293 327 33 360
28.Ramesh Reddy A 21201958 334 40 374
29.Rajendra Prasad K (SC) 22237113 298 36 334
30.Venkata Subba Reddy C 22213081 332 40 372
31.Lakshmi Suhasini S (BC-D) 20908878 293 14 307
32.Sunanda G 22211470 303 28 331
33.Venkata Lakshmamma V (SC) 21302078 244 26 270
34.Dasaratha Rami Reddy K 22285162 324 46 370
35.Visweswar Rao D Pule (BC-D) 21114357 313 32 345
36.Sreehari P 20901319 330 38 368
37.Nagaraju P.A (BC-A) 21000870 313 13 326
38.Rama Devi Y 21301345 296 35 321
39.Narayanaswamy L (SC) 21017057 298 34 332
40.Narsanaidu E 22205508 330 37 367
41.Bhaskar M (BC-B) 21016857 310 44 354
42.Vijay Kumar Y (ST) 22214210 315 16 331
43.Hari Krishna Vunnam 21200658 326 40 366
44.Prasantha Vijaya Kumar G (SC) 21001048 308 23 331
45.Vardhanadevi Polanki (BC-B) 21101474 283 45 328
46.Murali Kishore M (BC-A) 21100653 311 14 325
47.Pradeep M L N 21012905 333 33 366
48. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
49.Phanindra KVS 21301169 322 43 365
50.Srinivasulu Siragam (ST) 22278763 284 40 324
51.Naga Suneetha Rani Chakkera 22295534 282 42 324
52.Jansydul Shaik (BC-B) 22266823 326 22 348
53.Bhargava Reddy Patti 22201060 324 41 365
54.Vasumathi K (SC) 21112532 256 12 268
55.Bheemalinga G 22201163 330 34 364
56.Gopi Krishna A (BC-D) 21312405 313 28 341
57.Suneetha B 22211495 287 27 314
58.Ravichandra R (SC) 21318955 297 29 326
59.Shyam Prasad B 21216386 331 33 364
60.Srujan Babu G (BC-D) 21216060 314 25 339
61.Jayantha Reddy K 21200766 327 37 364
62.Chandrahas K (BC-B) 22201447 308 40 348
63.Thulasi Thiruveedhi K (BC-D) 21014463 295 14 309
64.Ramachandra M (SC) 21111173 318 07 325
65.Satyanarayana Madamanchi 21202202 320 43 363
66. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
ZONE- V
1. ST (W) NO CANDIDATE
2.Karuna Sree B (BC-B) 21600391 278 19 297
3.Narender Tadisen 21401044 331 47 378
4.Samuel John P (BC-C) 22208703 315 36 351
5.Sudarshan C 22211201 339 36 375
6.Nageshwararao K (SC) 22205429 307 37 344
7.Durga Bhavani G 20509820 288 40 328
8.Rajyalaxmi M (BC-D) 20702203 274 36 310
9.Ramesh Babu B (BC-B) 21501386 356 14 370
10.Ramprasad B (BC-A) 21625558 320 37 357
11.Nithin Kumar C (BC-B) 22205924 335 35 370
12.Lavanya Sandhya G (SC) 21700489 285 15 300
13.Sashi Kumari A (BC-B) 21701131 288 35 323
14.Sambamurthy K (BC-B) 22275411 338 14 352
15.Vinod Rathod (ST) 22213966 329 08 337
16.Krishna B 22203593 342 26 368
17.Rajasekher Rao V (SC) 22272966 294 39 333
18.Somashekar Chennuri (BC-B) 22277201 321 46 367
19.Ramamurthy J (BC-A) 22207930 320 29 349
20.Mamatha G 22204709 293 27 320
21.Nageswararao C 22205434 328 38 366
22.Rajesh Kumar A (BC-B) 22207375 332 33 365
ZONE- VI
1.Smitha Sowjanya N (SC) 22209860 282 34 316
2.Mahesh N (SC) 22204520 310 32 342
3.Rakesh S (SC) 22273493 306 28 334
4.Yadaiah T (SC) 22214114 295 36 331
5.Venkateswar Reddy V 22281944 358 40 398
6.Tirupati Reddy R 21909477 334 39 373
7.Sharada G (BC-A) 22109673 275 12 287
8.Subrahmanyam Muppalla 22211168 328 45 373
9.Manemma Macha (SC) 22204738 268 46 314
10.Ramesh Reddy S 22207894 338 35 373
11.Savithri Sowjanya K (BC-B) 20202241 290 27 317
12.Suhasini M 20703435 304 34 338
13.Srinivasarao Gunugati 22210940 328 44 372
14.Shyamsundar Palapati (SC) 22276938 283 43 326
15.Nagarjuna Reddy G 22108581 326 46 372
16.Chandrashaker G(BC-A) 21907243 306 33 339
17.Karuna Kancherla 22267472 294 43 337
18.Narsi Reddy S 22108692 326 44 370
19.Venkat Reddy Y 22212785 324 45 369
20.Kanakadurga B (ST) 22234924 210 32 242
21.Sreelatha Meda 22277401 294 42 336
22.Muralidhar D (BC-B) 21806488 335 33 368
23.Seetharami Reddy A 21301590 332 37 369
24.Mallaiah M (SC) 22269371 289 36 325
25.Madhubabu J (BC-B) 22204399 330 38 368
26.Prabhavathi B (BC-D) 22206388 272 34 306
27.Navaneetha M 22271262 293 39 332
28.Renuka B (SC) 22289371 269 36 305
29.Srinivas Reddy T 22210717 326 42 368
30.Edukondalu G (BC-D) 22265505 320 36 356
Name of the candidate HT No. Marks Obtained TOTAL
450 50 500
ZONE-I
1.Sudha Sagar S (BC-A) 20101552 348 35 383
2.Aparna K 20200094 329 42 371
3.Srinivasarao Y 20300823 353 39 392
4.Ambedkar T (ST) 20230636 255 39 294
5.Rama Lakshmi V.K. (BC-D) 20202961 328 42 370
6.Lokeswara Rao V.K.M (BC-B) 20202968 346 36 382
7.Venkata Ramana V (BC-D) 22281377 356 34 390
ZONE-II
1.Bhima Rao G (SC) 22201175 324 44 368
2.Venkata Surya Yella Rao 20515151 373 40 413
3.Madhusudhana Rao A (BC-A) 20218968 341 38 379
4.Madhuri Mulugu 20600657 342 45 387
5.Gangaraju M (OH) 20500403 308 22 330
6.Nagarjuna Reddy V 20501048 361 39 400
7.Radhika T (ST) 22272760 278 17 295
8.Devaki L (BC-D) 20500306 328 33 361
9.Venkata Satyanarayana (BC-B) 20601992 343 18 361
10.Srinivasu M 22210953 348 46 394
11.Sridhar N (SC) 22210283 330 32 362
12.Bala Subrahmanyam G 22200800 351 42 393
13.Swarna Latha K (BC-D) 22211898 305 46 351
14.Sivamma Laka Mani 22209835 335 26 361
15.Sridevi Busi (SC) 22210227 308 36 344
16.Subba Reddy G 22111119 348 45 393
17.Sreenu Vennela (BC-D) 22210145 327 38 365
18.Venkata Satish Kota 22292154 351 42 393
ZONE - III
1.Venkata Siva Kemeswararao S 20801582 365 34 399
2.Venkata Ramana Naik R (ST) 21001762 337 43 380
3.Sirisha M 20702838 345 36 381
4.Mohana Rao T (BC-B) 22204975 330 46 376
5.Chennaiah U (SC) 20800188 359 36 395
6. Venkateshwarulu K 20801676 358 35 393
7.Sudharani C 22211307 357 24 381
8.Sreenivasulu G (BC-D) 22210115 358 14 372
9.Ramesh Naidu K 20702377 354 38 392
10.Praveen Kumar T (SC) 20702014 354 30 384
11.Phaneendra Babu VSG 22206288 354 34 388
12.Venkata Ramana Rao B (BC-D) 20801555 320 42 362
13.Leela Rani B 20701242 328 43.5 371.5
14.Sujatha G (BC-A) 20703460 304 28 332
15.Venkateshwarulu G 22213481 352 35 387
16.Prashanthi T (SC) 20702007 288 35 323
17.Chennaiah K (BC-B) 20912622 341 45 386
18.Lakshmi Kumari C (BC-B) 20807747 307 25 332
19.Aruna Raprolu (BC-B) 20700199 320 44 364
20.Srinivasulu Reddy V 20901384 341 44 385
21.Vijay Bhaskar B (SC) 20704158 338 38 376
22.Ramkrishna Maram 22207579 343 42 385
23.Venkata Suneelu T (BC-A) 22213101 339 44 383
24.Padmadevi C 20701798 322 33 355
25.Anil Kumar G (OH) 22200282 313 36 349
ZONE- IV
1. Sailaja P 21301517 346 33 379
2.Naga Raju M (BC-B) 21100665 359 19 378
3.Sateesh K (OH) 21711483 324 35 359
4.Sridevi T (SC) 20423854 312 28 340
5.Madhusudhan Reddy Y 21201108 357 47 404
6.Gowri Shankara Rao G (BC-D) 20200618 343 46 389
7.Sireesha Juluganti 22209741 318 43 361
8.Kala Sagar T (SC) 22241120 315 42 357
9.Pulla Reddy V 22206721 358 45 403
10.Rama Mohan Baththala 22207632 321 44 365
11.Ram Bhupal Reddy O 21100930 362 39 401
12.Premantha Kumar S (BC-D) 20900947 331 33 364
13.Vijaya Lakshmi Kavalakuntla 22213861 314 40 354
14.Sivaramudu R (SC) 22290260 312 35 347
15.Maheshwar Reddy B 22204567 356 44 400
16.Sunitha Bai R (BC-B) 22211574 310 38 348
17.Vishwanath Challa 21202951 357 39 396
18.Kalavathi A 21011623 317 33 340
19.Vijaya Kumari P (SC) 22292543 297 28 327
20.Sreenivasulu T 21219900 358 36 394
21.Anupama Muktheswaram (BC-A)21200127 288 43 331
22.Vishnu Vardhan Reddy S 21202945 353 38 391
ZONE- V
1. Narasimha Rao G (BC-D) 21301517 346 33 379
2.Srilatha Ganta 21701311 340 43 383
3.Satyal Pal Reddy K (OH) 22209140 342 25 367
4.Madhusudhan P (BC-B) 22204440 360 23 383
5.Lokeshwara Rao V 22204202 360 34 394
6.Ashok Chakravarthy S (SC) 22200641 326 38 364
7.Gangaiah B (BC-B) 21500347 359 35 394
8.Suma Thalluri 21701439 318 44 362
9.Nagarajamma D (SC) 22270507 295 36 331
10.Sadanandam Pittala (BC-B) 21501500 367 26 393
11.Ramamurthy V (BC-D) 22207931 342 28 370
12.Raju S 22207334 358 33 391
13.Srinivas Rao G (BC-A) 21518093 329 34 363
14.Uma Rani P 21614543 306 44 350
15. Suvarna P (BC-D) 20308836 324 40 364
16.Venkatesh N (SC) 22281803 316 43 359
17.Kiran Prakash S (BC-B) 22294659 355 35 390
18.Srinivas N (BC-B) 21502021 349 32 381
19.Mangilal M (ST) 21619190 314 36 350
20.Komal Reddy C 22267897 345 44 389
21.Narayana K (SC) 22270899 317 32 349
22.Sunitha R (BC-B) 22211561 320 27 347
23.Suresh K (BC-A) 22211666 333 29 362
24.Madhu D (BC-B) 22204373 354 33 387
25. Srivani Sirimalla (BC-B) 21502066 294 42 336
26.Praveen Kumar Reddy C 22206639 346 40 386
27.Hari Krishna P (ST) 22202327 318 32 350
ZONE-VI
1.Chinna Appalanaidu P (BC-A) 20100201 343 36 379
2.Rama Krishna K 22207457 321 33 354
3.Anand Kumar P (BC-D) 22200186 332 42 374
4.Suresh Kumar Kollu 22211743 370 43 413
5.Devadas M (SC) 20700543 319 43 362
6.Zubedunnisa Begum Md. (VH) 21609448 152 8 160
7.Rajeswari M (BC-D) 20230913 318 42 360
8.Padma Priya P 22206024 358 38 396
9.Rajender G (BC-A) 22207118 327 42 379
10.Venkat Reddy Koppula 22212793 349 47 396
11.Lakshmi V. Namala (SC) 20402725 299 42 341
12.Koteshwara Rao V (BC-B) 22299172 338 33 371
13.Sanjay Kumar M (BC-B) 22208769 338 39 377
14.Shiva Kumar K (ST) 22276757 319 34 353
15.Rajender Reddy N 22207135 347 44 391
16.Anil Kumar V (SC) 22200252 333 28 361
17.Subramanyam D 21202484 351 39 390
18.Ram Prasad Mandagiri (BC-B) 20702209 319 48 367
19.Sharmila Muttineni 22209469 318 43 361
20. HH UNFILLED
21.Ram Reddy P 22207400 353 36 389
22.Yadiah Nimma (ST) 22282965 303 48 351
23.Susheela Konda Gadapa 22211806 310 42 352
24.Ahmad Shaik (BC-B) 22107243 328 46 374
25.Shaheeda Begum Md. (BC-B) 22209329 341 46 387
26.Venkatesh T 22213282 355 32 387
27.Venkata Lakshmi Potturi 21400493 301 46 347
28.Ramakrishna P (BC-D) 22273787 330 37 367
29.Ganesh Guntipalli 22201966 342 44 386
30.Bavaiah (SC) 22200937 315 38 353
31.Dhamodar Rao K 22201744 350 33 383
32.Venkanna M (BC-D) 22212741 331 35 366
33.Sridevi Vandanapu 22261518 301 45 346
34.Saraswathi S (BC-A) 22297431 278 36 314
35.Ashok Reddy Y 22200663 338 44 382
36.N R Saritha Nimma (SC) 22295491 307 26 333
37.Krishna Reddy M 22100509 335 45 380
38.Vishalakshi Chowdermet (BC-B) 22213989 279 45 324
39.Aruna V (BC-B) 22200540 328 15 343
40. Mahipal Kurella 22204576 334 46 380
41.Sudershan Y (SC) 22211216 309 37 346
42.NV Raju Gadiraju 22270304 334 44 378
43.Kasaiah Jakkampoodi (BC-A) 21700380 310 40 350
44.Nirmala Allam (BC-A) 22205898 310 32 342
45.Yadgiri A (BC-A) (OH) 21302265 307 32 339
46.Venkat Reddy Kunchala 22212786 342 35 377
47.Geetha B (ST) 22107727 267 13 280
48.Anitha Karra 22200297 304 38 342
49.Rajendhar Goud L (BC-B) 22207134 343 30 373
50.Saidulu P (BC-B) 22208600 345 32 377
51.Naveen Enumula (SC) 22287675 303 43 346
52.Sridhar D 22277714 346 30 376
53.Nirmala N (BC-D) 22205906 300 37 337
54.Archana Reddy Edulla 22113574 299 42 341
55.Sudha L (SC) 22298492 294 39 343
56.Srinivas Reddy Y 22210733 340 36 376
57.Naveen Marrapu (BC-D) 22287672 318 47 365
58.Naga Laxmi Kollu 22205161 331 44 375
59.Raveendar D (BC-A) 22208091 319 27 346
60. Jayamma Mandula (BC-B) 22202782 323 16 339
61.Krishnaiah Chepuri (SC) 22203726 308 37 345
DY. TAHSILDAR IN AP SUB SERVICE
ZONE-II
1.Narayana B (HH) 21800465 178 15 193
EXTENSION OFFICERS (RD) PANCHAYAT RAJ
ZONE- I
1.Srinivasa Chary S (BC-B) 21701340 326 35 361
2.Ramakrishna P 22207598 339 35 374
3.Radhika Telu (BC-D) 20220285 293 43 336
4.Sanyasi Raja Prakash P 20202100 335 32 367
ZONE- II
1.Bheemesh I K. (OH) 22201165 300 22 322
2.Padma Jyothi K 20401206 302 34 336
3.Kishore Babu D (SC) 22203455 338 18 356
4.Chinnarao C (BC-D) 22201581 318 33 351
5.Ashok Kumar B (SC) 22200643 319 36 355
6.Manikyam M 20400913 312 32 344
7.Rambabu J (BC-A) 22288915 337 24 361
ZONE- III
1.Ganga Mohan B (OH) 21805349 297 28 326
2.Satya Kumar E (SC) 20719221 321 36 355
3.Srinivasa Rao K (BC-B) 20703235 335 33 368
4.Ramesh Babu Vipparala (SC) 22207853 314 40 354
5.Praveena Kumari N (BC-B) 20619105 289 34 323
6.Veerabhadra Chary T (BC-B) 20801504 337 23 360
7.Kalpana Baby D 20700912 328 24 352
8.Siva Subrahmanyam P 20702888 330 45 375
ZONE- IV
1.Surendra Nath P (BC-A) 20901544 324 38 362
2.Sateesh Kumar M (BC-B) 21800795 331 33 364
3. VH (W) NO CANDIDATE
4.Prathyusha K (SC) 22288163 285 33 318
5.Pullaiah Y (SC) 21214389 300 34 334
6.Raghavendranath C (BC-B) 22206895 307 45 352
7. HH NO CANDIDATE
8.Sarada Sajjanam G (BC-B) 22208894 295 32 337
9.Srinivas Reddy S 22211194 329 45 374
10.Jyothi Lakshmi Devi P (BC-B) 21000510 300 44 344
11.Chandra Lekha Reddy K 22264710 289 45 334
12.Aruna V (BC-D) 21000062 293 38 331
ZONE-V
1.Adinarayana Reddy M 20700025 329 45 374
2.Chinna Nageshwara Rao R( BC-A) 20700484 325 33 358
3.David Varaprasad Pamula (SC) 20900210 311 40 351
4.Obulanaidu S 22205943 326 46 372
5.Pavan Gudla (BC-B) 22271903 340 27 367
6.Ramesh Budhe (BC-B) 21515635 327 39 366
7. Devaraju O (SC) 21623287 307 25 332
8.Venkateshwar Rao M 22213326 330 33 363
9.Naganath A (BC-D) 22205271 323 33 356
10.Bhikshapathi B 22201171 323 39 362
11.Ramadevi J (SC) 22273698 282 39 321
ZONE- VI
1.Swarnalatha M (BC-B) 22101568 281 36 317
2.Srikanth Reddy B 22210375 336 37 373
3.Srinivas Ambati (BC-B) 22210673 331 35 366
4.Raghava Rao 22206872 336 36 372
5.Rama Jyothi G (BC-B) 22273571 292 22 314
6.Narsi Reddy Gummitha 22205755 325 45 370
7. VH NO CANDIDATE
8.Satish Reddy Kalleda 22209109 325 44 369
ASST. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICERS
ZONE- I
1.Aravind Babu V (BC-A) 20700188 333 33 366
2.Rajeshwari K (BC-D) 20300515 319 39 358
3.Satyanarayana S (OH) 20221673 302 39 341
4.Sibhi Chakravarthy S (BC-D) 20202275 366 22 388
5.Rama Krishna Vendrapu (BC-D) 20201732 324 46 370
6.Naga Vara Prasad Adapa 20516205 337 44 381
7.Padmavibhushan S (BC-A) 20109354 335 23 358
8.Madhavi Vasantha (BC-A) 20201104 322 36 358
9.Siva Sankar L (SC) 22209812 322 32 354
10.V.Vani Prasad Beela (BC-D) 20301045 331 44 375
11.Bhaskara Rao Y (BC-B) 20200312 344 24 368
ZONE- II
1.Suresh Gadde (SC) 20720794 323 36 359
2. VH NON LOCAL NO CANDIDATE
3.Revathi V L YN P (BC-D) 20201980 323 32 355
4.Sowmya N 20601478 324 37 361
5.Lavanya G (BC-A) 20425240 304 17 321
6.Krishna Tataji T (HH) 20517561 164 16 180
7.Joya G (SC) 20400588 289 35 324
8.Kanaka Giri Sastry N.P 22206108 341 44 385
9.Vara Lakshmi K (BC-B) 20402834 305 32 337
ZONE-III
1.Varalakshmi K (BC-B) 22212529 348 16 364
2.Manjula A (SC) 21700551 296 26 322
3.Bharat Kumar K (ST) 22201027 314 15 329
4.Kaniki Reddy M (OH) 21400117 288 28 316
5.Parijatha B (SC) 22206178 285 36 321
6.Padmanabhaiah N 21100795 358 25 383
7.Ravanamma G (BC-D) 20702436 299 29 328
8.Prabhakara Rao M (SC) 22206374 336 45 381
9. HH NO CANDIDATE
10.Ramarao M (SC) 20718348 327 33 360
11.Anjamma L (ST) 22263247 290 13 303
12.Krishna Kanth M 20701084 336 45 381
13.Lakshmidevi K (BC-B) 20600606 283 42 325
ZONE-IV
1.Mohan K (SC) 21000768 336 24 360
2.Ravi Shankar M (BC-A) 21202016 370 26 396
3.Sridevi K (BC-D) 20202439 313 32 345
4.Prabhakar Reddy B V 22206363 347 40 387
5.Mohan Kumar Bharath (BC-A) 21201245 328 37 365
6.Naveen Kumar Reddy N 22205821 348 38 386
7.Sailaja Y (SC) 22208616 288 27 315
8. VH NO CANDIDATE
9 Sudershanam B BC-B 22279051 321 45 366
10 Chakra Naik S ST 22201329 306 30 336
11 Meghanath S OC 22204927 349 35 384
12 Satyam Dasanna Giri SC 22209160 316 32 348
13 Suneetha Singam Reddy OC 22211494 345 37 382
ZONE V
1 Pranaheetha Devi G BC-A 22206480 286 44 330
2 Govardhan P OC 22202198 347 35 382
3 Asha A OC 22263628 315 39 354
4 Devendhar N OC 22201731 348 33 381
5 Ashok K SC 22263654 296 39 335
6 Krishna Kumar N M OC 21700600 345 35 380
7 Tirupati P BC-A 22212064 326 24 350
8 Asia Sulthana OC 21600093 308 39 347
ZONE VI
1 VH (W) No Candidate
2? Shivaram Cheganti SC 22209595 293 45 338
2 ? Sujatha K OC 20703445 319 37 356
3? PurnaChandra Kala N HH 20100971 209 13 222
4 Uma Maheshwara Rao K BC-B 22212189 358 38 396
5 Nagaraja Naik K ST 22205282 316 34 350
6 Sujatha Pujari OC 21101363 312 42 354
7 Nagarjuna Uppala BC-B 22295589 331 40 371
8 Murali S OC 22270132 367 28 395
9 Dasaratha P BC-B 22100214 346 37 383
10 Kranthi Boda BC-A 22203577 304 48 352
11 Hanumatha Rao K BC-D 22107806 321 39 360
12 Shiva Datta G P BC-B 22209541 343 33 376
13 Ramesh Babu N SC 22296821 300 38 338
14 Venugopal Reddy Gantla OC 22213559 335 40 375
15 Jayaram V BC-D 22266918 325 34 359
16 Nagalakshmi Ranga OC 22205230 295 43 338
17 Anand Gayatri K BC-A 22000013 273 27 300
18 Lenin Gaddam OC 22100561 349 25 374
19 Sandhya Rani E SC 22275540 289 39 328
20 Santosh Kumar M OC 22208875 336 38 374
21 Sujatha Gajavelli BC-B 22211409 277 45 322
MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-III
MULTI ZONE-I
1.Bhanupratap A OH 20700348 354 29 383
MULTI ZONE-II
1.Surender V (BC-B) 22101542 366 33 399
2.Jagan D (ST) 22202572 315 39 354
EXCISE SUB INSPECTORS
ZONE-I
1.Chaitanya M (SC) 20100173 249 06 255
2.Seshu Kumari D (BC-D) 20202256 305 36 341
3.Nagaiah K (BC-B) 22100685 325 35 380
4.Pallavi K. L 20618659 299 33 332
5. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
6.Mallikarjuna Rao K 20600669 340 33 373
7.Ramachandra Rao P (BC-A) 20109792 324 32 356
8.Gayathri K 20600305 306 24 330
9.Srinivasa Rao M (BC-D) 20222612 326 46 372
10.Venkat Reddy M 20704032 331 37 368
11.K. Manju Khetavat (ST) 22245485 208 34 242
12.Khushbu K 22267687 300 30 330
13.Bala Narasimha C (BC-B) 21500136 320 38 358
14.YNBR Kumar K 20722250 342 26 368
15.Srinivasu G (SC) 20419554 311 35 346
16.Jayarami Reddy G 20715355 330 37 367
17.Leelarani P (BC-D) 20201081 280 22 302
18.Indira Devi K 20200671 285 35 320
19. SC (W) NO CANDIDATE
20.Ravi Kiran J (BC-D) 20300606 340 26 366
21.Narasimha Murthy B (BC-D) 20219616 323 32 355
22.Ravi Kumar V 22208177 333 33 366
23.Madhu Kumar B (BC-A) 22269012 309 17 326
24.Lakshmi Kodamanchili (BC-B) 20201002 275 44 319
25.Kameshwara Rao K (SC) 20108373 295 32 327
26.Venkata Rao M (BC-D) 22292256 340 24 364
27.Satish Kumar G (BC-B) 20300681 329 27 356
28. ST NO CANDIDATE
29.Srinivasa Rao Pinniti (BC-D) 90300003 317 46 363
30.Chakravarthi C (SC) 22201336 314 10 354
31.Rajeshwari N 22207234 343 30 373
32.Venkata Muralidhar Bendi (BC-A)20111635 312 08 320
33.Srinivasa Rao P 20402229 339 22 361
34. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
35.Sreenivas S 20202387 325 36 361
36. ST NO CANDIDATE
37.Kiran Manjeshwari B 20200876 274 33 307
38.VVS Sehkar Babu V (BC-B) 20101743 311 35 346
39.Jai Bheem R (SC) 20200706 315 43 358
40. SC (W) NO CANDIDATE
41.Upendra L (BC-B) 22291766 322 35 357
42.Venkatapunaidu K (BC-D) 20301047 330 24 354
43.Anuradha Devi L (BC-D) 22200458 280 27 307
44.Rajeshwari C (SC) 22207233 248 33 381
ZONE- II
1.Satyavathi R (BC-D) 20401942 307 13 320
2.Nagavalli I (SC) 20415841 267 39 306
3.Padmaja Ambati 20717414 311 44 355
4.Guruvaiah B (BC-B) 22202263 331 32 363
5.Srikrishna D. Garaga 22210388 339 46 385
6.Sudha D (SC) 20402453 294 22 316
7.Venkata Ramesh Nallem 20502659 342 40 382
8.Jairam Satish Babu Rowthu (BC-D)20517421 318 40 358
9.Lakshmi C 20400766 322 30 352
10.Srinivas P (SC) 22290639 320 36 356
11.Srinivas Javvadi 22207746 335 40 375
12.Venkatesham G (BC-D) 22213315 333 22 355
13.Surya Prakash Rao M 20420233 342 28 370
14.Sridhar K (BC-B) 20501994 321 36 357
15.Girija Satya Kumari P (BC-D) 20401257 316 33 349
16.Varala Raju B (SC) 20229756 317 33 350
17.Peddi Raju Ravi B 20500221 331 39 370
18.Jayasree A (BC-B) 20800331 291 38 319
19. VVSN Varma 22212419 330 38 368
20.Srivallari C 22211072 308 34 342
21.Naga Venkata Lakshmi B (SC) 22287360 280 23 303
22.Gopal Krishna Reddy T 20414059 341 25 366
23.Sowjanya Chekka (BC-A) 22259045 245 40 285
24.Mani Kantha Reddy S 20400907 330 36 366
25.Sri Kanaka Devi Mendu 22210334 300 42 342
26.Vidya Sudhahar K (SC) 20602097 313 37 350
27.Madhavi O (ST) 20600641 196 32 228
28.Ramesh Shaik (BC-B) 20501543 329 36 365
29.Venkateshwaramma P (BC-B) 20602064 295 25 320
30.Vasudeva Rao K 22212580 329 35 364
31.Tarangini C (BC-B) 20402637 301 36 337
32.Sreenivas J 21101222 328 36 364
33.Shaleem Raju T (BC-C) 20501861 349 14 363
34.Srinivas Palli (BC-D) 22278082 320 44 364
35.Nixon N (SC) 22205926 313 36 349
36.Arunamma C (BC-B) 22200595 307 28 335
ZONE- III
1.Lavanya Ambati (BC-D) 20723222 310 10 320
2.Vinay Kumar K 22213947 343 37 380
3.Anuradha K Budhavarapu (BC-B) 22200459 285 45 330
4.Veeranjaneyulu G 20703826 345 32 377
5.Suresh Babu Allangi (ST) 20223036 300 40 340
6.Rangamai Nagam (BC-D) 20717938 313 34 347
7.Kishore B (BC-B) 20701004 331 33 364
8.Abdul Zaleel Shaik Md. 20900599 342 35 377
9.Sivakumari Medikonda (SC) 20801119 271 44 315
10.Narahari Rao Ravipati 22205499 327 47 374
11.Venkata Rao Batchala (BC-D) 20801567 319 42 361
12.Leena A 22204158 301 42 343
13.Vijay Kumar P (SC) 20724450 325 29 354
14.Venkata Prasad Gollamuri 22212937 328 46 374
15.Vijaya Bhaskara Rao R (BC-D) 20801702 317 35 352
16.Bujji Babu K 22264580 333 38 371
17.Venkateshwara Rao V (BC-B) 20617746 325 32 357
18.Prabhavati K 20725603 303 36 339
19.Ramesh M (SC) 20800908 310 37 347
20.Rama Rao S 22207691 333 38 371
21. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
22.Kalyan P (BC-D) 22203087 342 28 370
ZONE- IV
1.Siva Krishnamma P 21202245 321 27 348
2.Mohan Reddy E 22204971 345 39 384
3.Ramamohan Gondi (BC-D) 21100958 329 33 363
4. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
5. BC-A (W) NO CANDIDATE
6.Krishna Kumar B (BC-D) 22268202 321 38 359
7.Veera Reddy U 22212624 343 37 380
8.Jawahar Babu P (SC) 22202731 312 33 345
9.Jayramanaidu Madamanchi 22202809 334 45 379
10.Sivasagar G (BC-D) 21316149 311 39 350
11.Leela Rani Kota (BC-B) 21011960 297 45 342
12.Lalitha Devi B (BC-A) 21313313 264 34 298
13.Gurunatha Reddy P 21200631 342 37 379
14.Lavanya I (SC) 22204038 275 27 302
15.Venkata Pavan Kumar Y 22281329 343 35 378
16.Gouri M (BC-B) 21000379 267 37 304
17.Neeraja Sriyapu Reddy 22205860 291 48 339
18.Mahesh Kumar S 22269275 340 38 378
19.Kalyan Kumar M (SC) 22203089 328 15 343
20.Vishwanatha Reddy G 22214034 333 44 377
21.Lakshmi D. Nagiri (BC-A) 22203909 313 44 357
22.Indira Banala (BC-B) 22202512 289 43 332
23.Dheeraj Reddy Sadhu 21016523 333 42 375
24.Chenna Reddy L 22201549 333 42 375
25.Urukundamma Y (ST) 21302014 238 27 265
26.Sarala Devi S (BC-B) 22275811 295 36 331
27.Somasekhar D (BC-B) 21202293 327 33 360
28.Ramesh Reddy A 21201958 334 40 374
29.Rajendra Prasad K (SC) 22237113 298 36 334
30.Venkata Subba Reddy C 22213081 332 40 372
31.Lakshmi Suhasini S (BC-D) 20908878 293 14 307
32.Sunanda G 22211470 303 28 331
33.Venkata Lakshmamma V (SC) 21302078 244 26 270
34.Dasaratha Rami Reddy K 22285162 324 46 370
35.Visweswar Rao D Pule (BC-D) 21114357 313 32 345
36.Sreehari P 20901319 330 38 368
37.Nagaraju P.A (BC-A) 21000870 313 13 326
38.Rama Devi Y 21301345 296 35 321
39.Narayanaswamy L (SC) 21017057 298 34 332
40.Narsanaidu E 22205508 330 37 367
41.Bhaskar M (BC-B) 21016857 310 44 354
42.Vijay Kumar Y (ST) 22214210 315 16 331
43.Hari Krishna Vunnam 21200658 326 40 366
44.Prasantha Vijaya Kumar G (SC) 21001048 308 23 331
45.Vardhanadevi Polanki (BC-B) 21101474 283 45 328
46.Murali Kishore M (BC-A) 21100653 311 14 325
47.Pradeep M L N 21012905 333 33 366
48. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
49.Phanindra KVS 21301169 322 43 365
50.Srinivasulu Siragam (ST) 22278763 284 40 324
51.Naga Suneetha Rani Chakkera 22295534 282 42 324
52.Jansydul Shaik (BC-B) 22266823 326 22 348
53.Bhargava Reddy Patti 22201060 324 41 365
54.Vasumathi K (SC) 21112532 256 12 268
55.Bheemalinga G 22201163 330 34 364
56.Gopi Krishna A (BC-D) 21312405 313 28 341
57.Suneetha B 22211495 287 27 314
58.Ravichandra R (SC) 21318955 297 29 326
59.Shyam Prasad B 21216386 331 33 364
60.Srujan Babu G (BC-D) 21216060 314 25 339
61.Jayantha Reddy K 21200766 327 37 364
62.Chandrahas K (BC-B) 22201447 308 40 348
63.Thulasi Thiruveedhi K (BC-D) 21014463 295 14 309
64.Ramachandra M (SC) 21111173 318 07 325
65.Satyanarayana Madamanchi 21202202 320 43 363
66. BC-B (W) NO CANDIDATE
ZONE- V
1. ST (W) NO CANDIDATE
2.Karuna Sree B (BC-B) 21600391 278 19 297
3.Narender Tadisen 21401044 331 47 378
4.Samuel John P (BC-C) 22208703 315 36 351
5.Sudarshan C 22211201 339 36 375
6.Nageshwararao K (SC) 22205429 307 37 344
7.Durga Bhavani G 20509820 288 40 328
8.Rajyalaxmi M (BC-D) 20702203 274 36 310
9.Ramesh Babu B (BC-B) 21501386 356 14 370
10.Ramprasad B (BC-A) 21625558 320 37 357
11.Nithin Kumar C (BC-B) 22205924 335 35 370
12.Lavanya Sandhya G (SC) 21700489 285 15 300
13.Sashi Kumari A (BC-B) 21701131 288 35 323
14.Sambamurthy K (BC-B) 22275411 338 14 352
15.Vinod Rathod (ST) 22213966 329 08 337
16.Krishna B 22203593 342 26 368
17.Rajasekher Rao V (SC) 22272966 294 39 333
18.Somashekar Chennuri (BC-B) 22277201 321 46 367
19.Ramamurthy J (BC-A) 22207930 320 29 349
20.Mamatha G 22204709 293 27 320
21.Nageswararao C 22205434 328 38 366
22.Rajesh Kumar A (BC-B) 22207375 332 33 365
ZONE- VI
1.Smitha Sowjanya N (SC) 22209860 282 34 316
2.Mahesh N (SC) 22204520 310 32 342
3.Rakesh S (SC) 22273493 306 28 334
4.Yadaiah T (SC) 22214114 295 36 331
5.Venkateswar Reddy V 22281944 358 40 398
6.Tirupati Reddy R 21909477 334 39 373
7.Sharada G (BC-A) 22109673 275 12 287
8.Subrahmanyam Muppalla 22211168 328 45 373
9.Manemma Macha (SC) 22204738 268 46 314
10.Ramesh Reddy S 22207894 338 35 373
11.Savithri Sowjanya K (BC-B) 20202241 290 27 317
12.Suhasini M 20703435 304 34 338
13.Srinivasarao Gunugati 22210940 328 44 372
14.Shyamsundar Palapati (SC) 22276938 283 43 326
15.Nagarjuna Reddy G 22108581 326 46 372
16.Chandrashaker G(BC-A) 21907243 306 33 339
17.Karuna Kancherla 22267472 294 43 337
18.Narsi Reddy S 22108692 326 44 370
19.Venkat Reddy Y 22212785 324 45 369
20.Kanakadurga B (ST) 22234924 210 32 242
21.Sreelatha Meda 22277401 294 42 336
22.Muralidhar D (BC-B) 21806488 335 33 368
23.Seetharami Reddy A 21301590 332 37 369
24.Mallaiah M (SC) 22269371 289 36 325
25.Madhubabu J (BC-B) 22204399 330 38 368
26.Prabhavathi B (BC-D) 22206388 272 34 306
27.Navaneetha M 22271262 293 39 332
28.Renuka B (SC) 22289371 269 36 305
29.Srinivas Reddy T 22210717 326 42 368
30.Edukondalu G (BC-D) 22265505 320 36 356
Petition dt 17th March
To
The Hon’ble Chairman,
The Union Public Service Commission,
New Delhi.
Respected Sir,
Sub:- Irregularities in the recruitments made by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission- Reg.
Encl:- 1. Judgment copy of the APIC, dated 23-01-2010
2. Marks copies of the information furnished under the RTI Act by the APPSC.
Sir, the recruitments made by the APPSC have almost always been mired in controversies. In order to get to know the truth, I had, on the 8th of Dec’ 2008, filed an RTI application with the PIO, APPSC seeking details, viz., Name, community, zone, marks obtained in written and interview by all the candidates who attended the interviews However, there was no correspondence from the PIO. My appeal before the First Appellate Authority of the APPSC dated 17th January 2009 also met the same fate.
Sir, their reluctance to divulge the information prompted me to approach the Hon’ble SCIC, APIC. The Hon’ble SCIC was kind enough to direct the APPSC to divulge the information that I had sought.
Sir, due to the sheer volume of the information provided to me by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, I desisted myself from mailing the entire set to you. However, given an opportunity, I shall be privileged to present the information for your kind perusal and necessary action.
Sir, one look at the marks awarded in the interviews to the candidates would reveal that there are wide spread disparities as to the marks scored in the written and in the interviews. Some who had top scored in the written secured abysmally low marks in the interview, while some who secured less marks in the written exam scored heavily in the interviews.
Sir, it was widely believed that some Members of the APPSC are hostile (by way of awarding lesser marks) towards candidates belonging to the Reserved Categories, thereby stifling their chance of making it in the Open competition. Here, I would like to quote certain instances, Sir. This data pertains to 312 plum posts, Viz., Deputy Collectors, DSP, CTO, RTO, etc of the Group-1 examination held under the notification 21/2003:
Out of the 24 who scored less than 40 marks out of 90, 14 belong to the BCs (i.e. 58%) and out of the 14, 7 belong to BC-D Least marks were awarded to SC candidates, while there are no Reddys who secured under 40.
But most striking is the case of Mr.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-B) bearing HT No.12203120. He got a top score of 687 in the written exam, but got only 32 in the interview taking his tally to 719 and had to be content with 4th overall.
Similarly, Mr.Chandra Shekar Goud (BC-B) bearing HT No.12232100 secured 678 marks in the written (2nd highest ) but was awarded only 28 in the interview taking to total to 706. He missed the chance of becoming a Deputy Collector (DC) by 1 mark
Similarly, Ms. Haritha Mundrathi (BC-A) who secured the highest written score (613) among the women Deputy Collectors. However, only 21 marks were awarded to her and she lost the opportunity of becoming a DC in the open category and had to claim reservation.
Similarly,Mr.Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) bearing HT.No 10601169 scored 649 but was awarded only 21 in the interview. Someone who could have made it into DC in open competition had to settle for DSP.
Almost similar is the case of Mr.Narasimha Rao Ch (SC) bearing HTNo.10703131 who got a decent score of 598 but was awarded the least of all just 13 marks in the interview.and had to settle for Assistant Audit Officer., though people who had scored lesser marks than him in the written got Dy.SP and that too in open competition.
Another incident relates to Mr.Samayjan Rao Ch(SC) bearing HT No.10606097 who secured 616 marks in written, i.e. joint 3rd highest among all the candidates selected for DSP post but only 13.5 in the interview. The combined tally now placed him on 21st position and he had to settle for the post of DSP under reservation quota
Hemantha Naga Raju (BC-A) and Meera Prasad E (BC-B)---- candidates who got lesser marks (in written) than them got selected as DSPs in open competition, while they had to claim reservation to get selected as an AES and RTO resply.
Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) HT No.10300512 scored 628 marks and was in the reckoning for Deputy Collector . However, he was awarded only 21 in the interview and the tally of 649 was good enough only for DSP Jails.
Srinivasa Rao T (BC-D) HT No.10702583 got 611 marks in written but 46 in interview and the total of 660 was just 10 marks short of being selected as a DSP in the open competition.
Yadagiri Rao N (BC-D) HT No.12257674 got 621 and 36 and a total of 657, candidates who scored less than him had become Dy. Collectors, CTOs, RTOs and DSPs in Open Competition, while he had to settle for Municipal Commissioner Grade-II.
Revathi Dedeepya M(BC-D) 12203641 got 601 and 32 and a total of 633, while some who scored less than her had become Dy. Collectors she had to contend with AAO (Local Fund)
Sir, you would be aware that the UPSC and other Public Service Commissions in India hardly, if ever, award more than 80% in the interviews to any candidate. It was shocking to note that the average marks of the selected candidates belonging to a particular community was in itself more than 80%, i.e. 73 out of 90 marks.
That’s not all Madam, an unbelievably high 138 candidates out of 550 (312 plum Group- 1 posts plus 238 MPDO posts) were awarded marks equal to or more than 80% in the interviews, i.e. 72 or more out of 90. Further, 36 candidates were awarded marks in excess of a staggering 90% with the highest being 88 out of 90, i.e., an unprecedented 98%.
The benevolence on the part of the APPSC is such that even the deeds of Daana Veera Soora Karna would pale in comparison! Or is there something more to it than that meets the eye?!
Sir, to satisfy yourself on the scale of irregularities , I humbly request you to check with the UPSC on the number of instances (in the past 5 years, 10 years or any such duration of time that you deem fit) wherein they had awarded interview marks in excess of 80%... let alone 90%. I am sure the figure arrived at would be a fraction of those awarded 80% or more in just one exam by the APPSC. That would present before you the gravity of the irregularities committed.
It is incomprehensible to note that such a highly educated and qualified person/s could’ve succumbed to the allure of nepotism/ favouritism (for whatever considerations).
Sir, such undue favours shown to a particular community has played a cruel joke on the hopes and aspirations of the candidates. The interview has been turned into a charade thereby making a mockery of the recruitment procedure.
Power, prestige and perks and equally importantly, the belief in the sense of ‘fair-play’ in recruitment is what attracts the bright students towards the Public Services. Such instances of nepotism on the one hand and discrimination on the other, strike at the roots of that belief and can have a devastating effect on the aspirants’ psyche and outlook towards the system as a whole.
On the brighter side, Sir, we note with great pleasure that the UPSC has always stood firm with it’s head above water. The professional way that the UPSC handles itself and conducts the exams, in a time bound manner, without any scope for allegations, etc is exemplary. Here’s hoping that the UPSC scales greater heights under your stewardship.
Having said that, Sir, in the interest of absolute transparency, I believe that it would be judicious and be widely appreciated if you could initiate the process of kindly disclosing the official keys to the General Studies and Optional subject question papers for the Civil Services Preliminary Test and all other Preliminary exams conducted by your esteemed Commission.
Thanking you Sir,
Yours faithfully,
(Sunand P)
The Hon’ble Chairman,
The Union Public Service Commission,
New Delhi.
Respected Sir,
Sub:- Irregularities in the recruitments made by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission- Reg.
Encl:- 1. Judgment copy of the APIC, dated 23-01-2010
2. Marks copies of the information furnished under the RTI Act by the APPSC.
Sir, the recruitments made by the APPSC have almost always been mired in controversies. In order to get to know the truth, I had, on the 8th of Dec’ 2008, filed an RTI application with the PIO, APPSC seeking details, viz., Name, community, zone, marks obtained in written and interview by all the candidates who attended the interviews However, there was no correspondence from the PIO. My appeal before the First Appellate Authority of the APPSC dated 17th January 2009 also met the same fate.
Sir, their reluctance to divulge the information prompted me to approach the Hon’ble SCIC, APIC. The Hon’ble SCIC was kind enough to direct the APPSC to divulge the information that I had sought.
Sir, due to the sheer volume of the information provided to me by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, I desisted myself from mailing the entire set to you. However, given an opportunity, I shall be privileged to present the information for your kind perusal and necessary action.
Sir, one look at the marks awarded in the interviews to the candidates would reveal that there are wide spread disparities as to the marks scored in the written and in the interviews. Some who had top scored in the written secured abysmally low marks in the interview, while some who secured less marks in the written exam scored heavily in the interviews.
Sir, it was widely believed that some Members of the APPSC are hostile (by way of awarding lesser marks) towards candidates belonging to the Reserved Categories, thereby stifling their chance of making it in the Open competition. Here, I would like to quote certain instances, Sir. This data pertains to 312 plum posts, Viz., Deputy Collectors, DSP, CTO, RTO, etc of the Group-1 examination held under the notification 21/2003:
Out of the 24 who scored less than 40 marks out of 90, 14 belong to the BCs (i.e. 58%) and out of the 14, 7 belong to BC-D Least marks were awarded to SC candidates, while there are no Reddys who secured under 40.
But most striking is the case of Mr.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-B) bearing HT No.12203120. He got a top score of 687 in the written exam, but got only 32 in the interview taking his tally to 719 and had to be content with 4th overall.
Similarly, Mr.Chandra Shekar Goud (BC-B) bearing HT No.12232100 secured 678 marks in the written (2nd highest ) but was awarded only 28 in the interview taking to total to 706. He missed the chance of becoming a Deputy Collector (DC) by 1 mark
Similarly, Ms. Haritha Mundrathi (BC-A) who secured the highest written score (613) among the women Deputy Collectors. However, only 21 marks were awarded to her and she lost the opportunity of becoming a DC in the open category and had to claim reservation.
Similarly,Mr.Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) bearing HT.No 10601169 scored 649 but was awarded only 21 in the interview. Someone who could have made it into DC in open competition had to settle for DSP.
Almost similar is the case of Mr.Narasimha Rao Ch (SC) bearing HTNo.10703131 who got a decent score of 598 but was awarded the least of all just 13 marks in the interview.and had to settle for Assistant Audit Officer., though people who had scored lesser marks than him in the written got Dy.SP and that too in open competition.
Another incident relates to Mr.Samayjan Rao Ch(SC) bearing HT No.10606097 who secured 616 marks in written, i.e. joint 3rd highest among all the candidates selected for DSP post but only 13.5 in the interview. The combined tally now placed him on 21st position and he had to settle for the post of DSP under reservation quota
Hemantha Naga Raju (BC-A) and Meera Prasad E (BC-B)---- candidates who got lesser marks (in written) than them got selected as DSPs in open competition, while they had to claim reservation to get selected as an AES and RTO resply.
Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) HT No.10300512 scored 628 marks and was in the reckoning for Deputy Collector . However, he was awarded only 21 in the interview and the tally of 649 was good enough only for DSP Jails.
Srinivasa Rao T (BC-D) HT No.10702583 got 611 marks in written but 46 in interview and the total of 660 was just 10 marks short of being selected as a DSP in the open competition.
Yadagiri Rao N (BC-D) HT No.12257674 got 621 and 36 and a total of 657, candidates who scored less than him had become Dy. Collectors, CTOs, RTOs and DSPs in Open Competition, while he had to settle for Municipal Commissioner Grade-II.
Revathi Dedeepya M(BC-D) 12203641 got 601 and 32 and a total of 633, while some who scored less than her had become Dy. Collectors she had to contend with AAO (Local Fund)
Sir, you would be aware that the UPSC and other Public Service Commissions in India hardly, if ever, award more than 80% in the interviews to any candidate. It was shocking to note that the average marks of the selected candidates belonging to a particular community was in itself more than 80%, i.e. 73 out of 90 marks.
That’s not all Madam, an unbelievably high 138 candidates out of 550 (312 plum Group- 1 posts plus 238 MPDO posts) were awarded marks equal to or more than 80% in the interviews, i.e. 72 or more out of 90. Further, 36 candidates were awarded marks in excess of a staggering 90% with the highest being 88 out of 90, i.e., an unprecedented 98%.
The benevolence on the part of the APPSC is such that even the deeds of Daana Veera Soora Karna would pale in comparison! Or is there something more to it than that meets the eye?!
Sir, to satisfy yourself on the scale of irregularities , I humbly request you to check with the UPSC on the number of instances (in the past 5 years, 10 years or any such duration of time that you deem fit) wherein they had awarded interview marks in excess of 80%... let alone 90%. I am sure the figure arrived at would be a fraction of those awarded 80% or more in just one exam by the APPSC. That would present before you the gravity of the irregularities committed.
It is incomprehensible to note that such a highly educated and qualified person/s could’ve succumbed to the allure of nepotism/ favouritism (for whatever considerations).
Sir, such undue favours shown to a particular community has played a cruel joke on the hopes and aspirations of the candidates. The interview has been turned into a charade thereby making a mockery of the recruitment procedure.
Power, prestige and perks and equally importantly, the belief in the sense of ‘fair-play’ in recruitment is what attracts the bright students towards the Public Services. Such instances of nepotism on the one hand and discrimination on the other, strike at the roots of that belief and can have a devastating effect on the aspirants’ psyche and outlook towards the system as a whole.
On the brighter side, Sir, we note with great pleasure that the UPSC has always stood firm with it’s head above water. The professional way that the UPSC handles itself and conducts the exams, in a time bound manner, without any scope for allegations, etc is exemplary. Here’s hoping that the UPSC scales greater heights under your stewardship.
Having said that, Sir, in the interest of absolute transparency, I believe that it would be judicious and be widely appreciated if you could initiate the process of kindly disclosing the official keys to the General Studies and Optional subject question papers for the Civil Services Preliminary Test and all other Preliminary exams conducted by your esteemed Commission.
Thanking you Sir,
Yours faithfully,
(Sunand P)
Petition to the PM dt 22-03-10
To
The Hon’ble Prime Minister,
Government of India,
New Delhi.
Sir,
Sub:- Irregularities in the recruitments made by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission under Notification No. 21/2003- Petition to the President to invoke Article 317 and call for an enquiry by the Supreme Court- Reg.
Encl:- 1.Copy of the petition sent to the President of India
2. Marks copies furnished by the APPSC under the RTI Act,
2005.
3. Copies of the News paper articles of the Eenadu Telugu
Daily, The Hindu
Sir, please refer to the petition addressed to the President of India and you will come to know of the enormity of the irregularities committed by the APPSC in the Group-1 recruitments made in the year 2006 under the Notification No. 21/ 2003.
Sincerely hoping that you would take steps to address this issue on a priority basis.
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
(Sunand P)
From:
Sunand P
28, Bal Reddy Nagar,
Toli Chowki, Hyd-8
The Hon’ble Prime Minister,
Government of India,
New Delhi.
Sir,
Sub:- Irregularities in the recruitments made by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission under Notification No. 21/2003- Petition to the President to invoke Article 317 and call for an enquiry by the Supreme Court- Reg.
Encl:- 1.Copy of the petition sent to the President of India
2. Marks copies furnished by the APPSC under the RTI Act,
2005.
3. Copies of the News paper articles of the Eenadu Telugu
Daily, The Hindu
Sir, please refer to the petition addressed to the President of India and you will come to know of the enormity of the irregularities committed by the APPSC in the Group-1 recruitments made in the year 2006 under the Notification No. 21/ 2003.
Sincerely hoping that you would take steps to address this issue on a priority basis.
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
(Sunand P)
From:
Sunand P
28, Bal Reddy Nagar,
Toli Chowki, Hyd-8
Petition to the Gov dt 13th Feb
To
His Excellency,
The Governor of Andhra Pradesh,
Raj Bhavan, Hyderabad.
Honourable Sir,
Sub :- APPSC- absolute lack of urgency in conducting
examinations for posts notified years ago- Reg.
Encl:- 1. Judgment copy of the CIC, APIC.
2. Applications proposed for rejection containing
the notification year.
3. The schedule of exams dated 10-02-10.
4. News article of Sakshi dated 02/05/09
Sir, from your plain-speak at the Vice-Chancellors’ Conference you seem to be a man of affirmative action. Sir, this positive impression goaded me to address this representation directly to you.
Sir, it gives me great pleasure to say that the Hon’ble Chief Information Commissioner, APIC, while disposing my appeal, directed the APPSC to post on their website the names and marks (written and interview) of the selected candidates for the recruitments henceforth made by the APPSC. This judgment will go a long way in ensuring not only transparency but also restore some amount of credibility to the APPSC. (Please refer to encl. 1)
However, Sir, if the Group-1 Services recruitments made by the APPSC vide Notification Nos. 21/ 2003 and 6/2004 and 31/ 2007 were inordinately delayed because of legal wrangles, there are dozens of Notifications (some issued almost 2 years back) for various posts which seem to be gathering dust while lying “unattended to”.
• Sir, the latest Group-I notification was issued on 30 – 12 - 08; applications were accepted online from 29/07/09 to 01/09/09.However, there was no mention of the Exam date.
• Sir, the latest Group-II Services notification was issued vide Notification No. 38/2008 and Supplementary Notification No. 11/2009. The applications are invited On-line from 01/10/2009 to 03/11/2009. There has been no word yet about the exam schedule.
• Sir, it has been the case with almost every notification issued by the APPSC. For ex. Online Applications for the posts of DAO were accepted from 16/01/09 to 31/01/09. An year has passed-by, yet no body knows when they would be conducting the exam.
• Sir, exams to the posts of Lecturers in Government Polytechnic Colleges and Junior Lecturers in Intermediate Education Service vide Notification No. 19/2008 & 5/2008, have been postponed indefinitely.
• Sir, kindly refer to enclosure 2 for information on posts like the Assistant Director in Town and Country Planning, Assistant Architectural Draughtsman and Surveyors in A.P. TPSS and Town Planning Assistants in. A.P. Town Planning Subordinate Service, etc. The notifications were issued in 2008 and the APPSC is, in the year 2010, still evaluating the applications.
• Sir, kindly refer to enclosure 3 for the schedule of exams for the posts of Technical Assistant in A.P. Mining Service, etc. Sir, as is evident, the examination dates have been announced nearly two years after issuance of the notifications. However, Sir, it is to be seen if they manage to conduct exams as per this schedule.
Sir, to the common man, the APPSC resembles a money making machine. Application fee and examination fee are collected promptly. However, when it comes to conducting examinations, on time, one finds that there is no sense of urgency at all. To be honest, Sir, by not having announced any schedule in advance, the APPSC can perhaps claim that they were never late in conducting the exams.
Sir, needless to over-emphasize that the lack of recruitment and the consequent unfilled vacancies make the administration ill-equipped to serve the needs of the common man and meet the exigencies, if any; and that the lack of time-bound recruitment to Lecturer Posts would harm the students immensely.
Sir, it is dis-heartening to know that the powers-that-be seem to be insensitive to the fact that most people quit jobs, apply for leave and study in the hope that exams would be conducted immediately once the notification is issued. Sir, isn’t it pertinent to ask, “what right does the APPSC have to play with the careers and lives of lakhs of aspirants?” Sir, one interaction with aspirants who abound the Universities and colleges across AP, and in the case of Hyderabad at places like Ashok Nagar and Gandhi Nagar would make their travails crystal clear.
Sir, even when exams are conducted, the results are almost always mired in controversies with allegations about regionalism, nepotism doing rounds. Kindly refer to enclosure 4 where-in a Member and the Chairman were involved in a verbal spat. Such things raise serious questions about the credibility of the selection process.
Sir, when technology is used to make the application process entirely online, why can’t technology be used to post the Names, Marks, Community, Zone, etc, of the selected candidates on the official website to ensure transparency? Here I would like to mention that, the SPSCs of Bihar, Kerala and Himachal Pradesh, etc, post on their websites, even the official keys to the Preliminary exam question papers !
Sir, taking all these issues into consideration, I humbly request you to direct the APPSC to, henceforth, conduct exams as per a time-bound schedule and not issue notifications just to raise funds, but to announce the examination date while issuing the notification itself, which will improve it’s credibility even further.
However, Sir, if you find the APPSC incompetent to conduct exams as per a time-bound schedule and without any legal wrangles, you can invoke the provisions of Art. 320 of the Constitution of India, which states that, “ the Public Service Commission for the Union, if requested so to do by the Governor of a State, may, with the approval of the President, agree to serve all or any of the needs of the State.”
Thanking you Sir,
Yours sincerely,
Sunand P
His Excellency,
The Governor of Andhra Pradesh,
Raj Bhavan, Hyderabad.
Honourable Sir,
Sub :- APPSC- absolute lack of urgency in conducting
examinations for posts notified years ago- Reg.
Encl:- 1. Judgment copy of the CIC, APIC.
2. Applications proposed for rejection containing
the notification year.
3. The schedule of exams dated 10-02-10.
4. News article of Sakshi dated 02/05/09
Sir, from your plain-speak at the Vice-Chancellors’ Conference you seem to be a man of affirmative action. Sir, this positive impression goaded me to address this representation directly to you.
Sir, it gives me great pleasure to say that the Hon’ble Chief Information Commissioner, APIC, while disposing my appeal, directed the APPSC to post on their website the names and marks (written and interview) of the selected candidates for the recruitments henceforth made by the APPSC. This judgment will go a long way in ensuring not only transparency but also restore some amount of credibility to the APPSC. (Please refer to encl. 1)
However, Sir, if the Group-1 Services recruitments made by the APPSC vide Notification Nos. 21/ 2003 and 6/2004 and 31/ 2007 were inordinately delayed because of legal wrangles, there are dozens of Notifications (some issued almost 2 years back) for various posts which seem to be gathering dust while lying “unattended to”.
• Sir, the latest Group-I notification was issued on 30 – 12 - 08; applications were accepted online from 29/07/09 to 01/09/09.However, there was no mention of the Exam date.
• Sir, the latest Group-II Services notification was issued vide Notification No. 38/2008 and Supplementary Notification No. 11/2009. The applications are invited On-line from 01/10/2009 to 03/11/2009. There has been no word yet about the exam schedule.
• Sir, it has been the case with almost every notification issued by the APPSC. For ex. Online Applications for the posts of DAO were accepted from 16/01/09 to 31/01/09. An year has passed-by, yet no body knows when they would be conducting the exam.
• Sir, exams to the posts of Lecturers in Government Polytechnic Colleges and Junior Lecturers in Intermediate Education Service vide Notification No. 19/2008 & 5/2008, have been postponed indefinitely.
• Sir, kindly refer to enclosure 2 for information on posts like the Assistant Director in Town and Country Planning, Assistant Architectural Draughtsman and Surveyors in A.P. TPSS and Town Planning Assistants in. A.P. Town Planning Subordinate Service, etc. The notifications were issued in 2008 and the APPSC is, in the year 2010, still evaluating the applications.
• Sir, kindly refer to enclosure 3 for the schedule of exams for the posts of Technical Assistant in A.P. Mining Service, etc. Sir, as is evident, the examination dates have been announced nearly two years after issuance of the notifications. However, Sir, it is to be seen if they manage to conduct exams as per this schedule.
Sir, to the common man, the APPSC resembles a money making machine. Application fee and examination fee are collected promptly. However, when it comes to conducting examinations, on time, one finds that there is no sense of urgency at all. To be honest, Sir, by not having announced any schedule in advance, the APPSC can perhaps claim that they were never late in conducting the exams.
Sir, needless to over-emphasize that the lack of recruitment and the consequent unfilled vacancies make the administration ill-equipped to serve the needs of the common man and meet the exigencies, if any; and that the lack of time-bound recruitment to Lecturer Posts would harm the students immensely.
Sir, it is dis-heartening to know that the powers-that-be seem to be insensitive to the fact that most people quit jobs, apply for leave and study in the hope that exams would be conducted immediately once the notification is issued. Sir, isn’t it pertinent to ask, “what right does the APPSC have to play with the careers and lives of lakhs of aspirants?” Sir, one interaction with aspirants who abound the Universities and colleges across AP, and in the case of Hyderabad at places like Ashok Nagar and Gandhi Nagar would make their travails crystal clear.
Sir, even when exams are conducted, the results are almost always mired in controversies with allegations about regionalism, nepotism doing rounds. Kindly refer to enclosure 4 where-in a Member and the Chairman were involved in a verbal spat. Such things raise serious questions about the credibility of the selection process.
Sir, when technology is used to make the application process entirely online, why can’t technology be used to post the Names, Marks, Community, Zone, etc, of the selected candidates on the official website to ensure transparency? Here I would like to mention that, the SPSCs of Bihar, Kerala and Himachal Pradesh, etc, post on their websites, even the official keys to the Preliminary exam question papers !
Sir, taking all these issues into consideration, I humbly request you to direct the APPSC to, henceforth, conduct exams as per a time-bound schedule and not issue notifications just to raise funds, but to announce the examination date while issuing the notification itself, which will improve it’s credibility even further.
However, Sir, if you find the APPSC incompetent to conduct exams as per a time-bound schedule and without any legal wrangles, you can invoke the provisions of Art. 320 of the Constitution of India, which states that, “ the Public Service Commission for the Union, if requested so to do by the Governor of a State, may, with the approval of the President, agree to serve all or any of the needs of the State.”
Thanking you Sir,
Yours sincerely,
Sunand P
Petition dated 18th Mar
To
Her Excellency,
The President of India
New Delhi.
Madam,
Sub:- Irregularities in the recruitments made by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission under Notification No. 21/2003- Request to invoke Article 317 and call for an enquiry by the Supreme Court- Reg.
Encl:- 1. Judgment copy of the APIC, dated 23-01-2010
2. Copies of the information furnished by the APPSC.
3. E-version of a book written by the UPSC Civil Services toppers.
4. Copies of the News paper articles of the Eenadu Telugu Daily, The Hindu and the Surya.
Madam, the recruitments made by the APPSC have almost always been mired in controversies. In order to get to know the truth, I had on 8th Dec’ 2008 filed an RTI application with the PIO, APPSC seeking details, viz., Name, community, zone, marks obtained in written and interview respectively of all the candidates who attended the interviews. However, there was no correspondence from the PIO. My 1st appeal before the First Appellate Authority of the APPSC dated 17th January 2009 also met the same fate.
Madam, their reluctance to divulge the information prompted me to approach the Hon’ble SCIC, APIC. He was kind enough to direct the APPSC to divulge the information that I had sought.
Madam, I present before you the information provided to me by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission for your kind perusal and necessary action. Madam, one look at the marks awarded in the interviews to the candidates would reveal that there are wide spread disparities as to the marks scored in the written and in the interviews. Some who had top scored in the written secured abysmally low marks in the interview, while some who secured less marks in the written exam scored heavily in the interviews.
Madam, it was widely believed that some Members of the APPSC are hostile (by way of awarding lesser marks) towards candidates belonging to the Reserved Categories, thereby stifling their chance of making it in the Open competition. Here, I would like to quote certain instances, Madam. This data pertains to 312 plum posts of the Group-1 examination held under the notification 21/2003:
As regards 312 plum posts of the Group-1 Services, viz. Dy. Collector, DSP, CTO, Municipal Commissioner,RTO, etc out of the 24 who scored less than 40 marks out of 90, 14 belong to the BCs (i.e. 58%) and out of the 14, 7 belong to BC-D. Least marks (13 out of 90) were awarded to SC candidates.
But most striking is the case of Mr.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-B) bearing HT No.12203120. He got a top score of 687 in the written exam, but got only 32 in the interview taking his tally to 719 and had to be content with 4th overall.
Similarly, Mr.Chandra Shekar Goud (BC-B) bearing HT No.12232100 secured 678 marks in the written (2nd highest ) but was awarded only 28 in the interview taking to total to 706. He missed the chance of becoming a Deputy Collector (DC) by 1 mark
Similarly, Ms. Haritha Mundrathi who secured the highest written score (613) among the women Deputy Collectors. However, only 21 marks were awarded to her and she lost the opportunity of becoming a DC in the open category and had to claim reservation.
Similarly,Mr.Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) bearing HT.No 10601169 scored 649 but was awarded only 21 in the interview. Someone who could have made it into DC in open competition had to settle for DSP.
Almost similar is the case of Mr.Narasimha Rao Ch (SC) bearing HTNo.10703131 who got a decent score of 598 but was awarded the least of all just 13 marks in the interview and had to settle for Assistant Audit Officer., though people who had scored lesser marks than him in the written got Dy.SP and that too in open competition.
Another incident relates to Mr.Samayjan Rao Ch(SC) bearing HT No.10606097 who secured 616 marks in written, i.e. joint 3rd highest among all the candidates selected for DSP post but only 13.5 in the interview. The combined tally now placed him on 21st position and he had to settle for the post of DSP under reservation quota
In the case of Mr. Hemantha Naga Raju (BC-A) HT. No. 10704284 and Mr. Meera Prasad E (BC-B),HT No. 10500554 candidates who got lesser marks (in written) than them got selected as DSPs in open competition, while they had to claim reservation to get selected as an AES and RTO resply.
Mr. Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) HT No.10300512 scored 628 marks and was in the reckoning for Deputy Collector . However, he was awarded only 21 in the interview and the tally of 649 was good enough only for DSP Jails.
Mr. Srinivasa Rao T (BC-D) HT No.10702583 got 611 marks in written but 46 in interview and the total of 660 was just 10 marks short of being selected as a DSP in the open competition.
Mr. Yadagiri Rao N (BC-D) HT No.12257674 got 621 and 36 and a total of 657, candidates who scored less than him had become Dy. Collectors, CTOs, RTOs and DSPs in Open Competition, while he had to settle for Municipal Commissioner Grade-II.
Ms. Revathi Dedeepya M(BC-D)HT No. 12203641 got 601 and 32 and a total of 633, while some who scored less than her had become Dy. Collectors and that too in open competition she had to contend with AAO (Local Fund)
Madam, you would be aware that the UPSC and other Public Service Commissions in India hardly, if ever, award more than 80% in the interview to any candidate. It was shocking to note that the average marks of the selected candidates belonging to a particular community was 73 out of 90 marks, which in itself is more than 80%, while the average marks for OCs (other than that community) was a reasonable 64; and 60 for SCs, 60 for BCs and 53 for STs.
That’s not all Madam, an unbelievably high 138 out of 550 candidates (312 plum Group-1 posts plus 238 MPDO posts) were awarded marks equal to or more than 80% in the interviews, i.e. 72 or more out of 90. Further, a staggering 29 candidates were awarded 81 marks or more, i.e. in excess of 90% with the highest being 88 out of 90 HT No. 12219893, i.e., an unprecedented 98%.
The benevolence on the part of the APPSC is such that even the deeds of Daana Veera Soora Karna would pale in comparison! Or is there something more to it than that meets the eye?!
Madam, it is plain knowledge that even in the case of elections, there is a re-poll if the turnout in a particular booth or a constituency crosses the 90% mark.
Madam, to satisfy yourself on the scale of irregularities , I humbly request you to ask the UPSC to furnish information on the number of instances (in the past 5 years, 10 years or any such duration of time that you deem fit) wherein they had awarded interview marks in excess of 80%... let alone 90%. I am sure the figure arrived at would be a fraction of those awarded 80% in just one exam conducted by the APPSC. That would present before you the enormity of the irregularities committed.
I request you Madam, to invoke the provisions of the Article 317 of the Constitution which states that, “… the CHAIRMAN or any other Member of a Public Service Commission shall only be removed from his office… on the ground of misbehaviour according to the report of the Supreme Court which shall hold an enquiry on this matter on a reference being made by the President.”
Further, Article 317 (4) clearly states that , “a Member shall be deemed to be guilty of misbehaviour… if he is in any way concerned or interested in any contract made on behalf of the Government of India or of a State…”
Madam, it is held even by the Supreme Court that, the concept of employment involves three ingredients: (1) employer, (2) employee, (3) the contract of employment. It is common knowledge that only those candidates who are recommended for selection by a Public Service Commission are awarded the contract of employment by the respective State Governments or the Central Government, as the case may be.
Thus, in this instant case, the Members of the APPSC would be guilty of misbehaviour since it has become amply clear that they awarded higher marks in the interviews to candidates belonging to a particular community. In addition to that, for deliberately, willfully and with malice awarding lesser marks to candidates from the Reserved Categories, viz., SC, ST, BC. And in addition to that Madam, the unimaginable scale of benevolence in awarding interview marks smacks of something equally if not more sinister.
It is incomprehensible to note that such highly educated and qualified person/s could’ve succumbed to the allure of nepotism/ favouritism (for whatever considerations). Madam, such undue favours shown to a particular community has played a cruel joke on the hopes and aspirations of the candidates. The interview has been turned into a charade and thus making a mockery of the recruitment procedure.
Power, prestige and perks and equally importantly, the belief in the sense of ‘fair-play’ in recruitment is what attracts the bright students towards the Public Services. Such instances of nepotism on the one hand and discrimination on the other, strike at the roots of the belief and can have a devastating effect on the aspirants’ psyche and outlook towards the system as a whole.
Madam, I humbly request you call for a Supreme Court inquiry by exercising the powers vested in you under the Art. 317 of the Constitution of India into this matter so that the truth is brought out into the open and the trust of the common man, at least, in Autonomous Institutions is restored.
Thanking you Madam,
Yours faithfully,
(Sunand P)
Copy submitted to:
1. H.E. The Hon’ble Governor of Andhra Pradesh.
Her Excellency,
The President of India
New Delhi.
Madam,
Sub:- Irregularities in the recruitments made by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission under Notification No. 21/2003- Request to invoke Article 317 and call for an enquiry by the Supreme Court- Reg.
Encl:- 1. Judgment copy of the APIC, dated 23-01-2010
2. Copies of the information furnished by the APPSC.
3. E-version of a book written by the UPSC Civil Services toppers.
4. Copies of the News paper articles of the Eenadu Telugu Daily, The Hindu and the Surya.
Madam, the recruitments made by the APPSC have almost always been mired in controversies. In order to get to know the truth, I had on 8th Dec’ 2008 filed an RTI application with the PIO, APPSC seeking details, viz., Name, community, zone, marks obtained in written and interview respectively of all the candidates who attended the interviews. However, there was no correspondence from the PIO. My 1st appeal before the First Appellate Authority of the APPSC dated 17th January 2009 also met the same fate.
Madam, their reluctance to divulge the information prompted me to approach the Hon’ble SCIC, APIC. He was kind enough to direct the APPSC to divulge the information that I had sought.
Madam, I present before you the information provided to me by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission for your kind perusal and necessary action. Madam, one look at the marks awarded in the interviews to the candidates would reveal that there are wide spread disparities as to the marks scored in the written and in the interviews. Some who had top scored in the written secured abysmally low marks in the interview, while some who secured less marks in the written exam scored heavily in the interviews.
Madam, it was widely believed that some Members of the APPSC are hostile (by way of awarding lesser marks) towards candidates belonging to the Reserved Categories, thereby stifling their chance of making it in the Open competition. Here, I would like to quote certain instances, Madam. This data pertains to 312 plum posts of the Group-1 examination held under the notification 21/2003:
As regards 312 plum posts of the Group-1 Services, viz. Dy. Collector, DSP, CTO, Municipal Commissioner,RTO, etc out of the 24 who scored less than 40 marks out of 90, 14 belong to the BCs (i.e. 58%) and out of the 14, 7 belong to BC-D. Least marks (13 out of 90) were awarded to SC candidates.
But most striking is the case of Mr.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-B) bearing HT No.12203120. He got a top score of 687 in the written exam, but got only 32 in the interview taking his tally to 719 and had to be content with 4th overall.
Similarly, Mr.Chandra Shekar Goud (BC-B) bearing HT No.12232100 secured 678 marks in the written (2nd highest ) but was awarded only 28 in the interview taking to total to 706. He missed the chance of becoming a Deputy Collector (DC) by 1 mark
Similarly, Ms. Haritha Mundrathi who secured the highest written score (613) among the women Deputy Collectors. However, only 21 marks were awarded to her and she lost the opportunity of becoming a DC in the open category and had to claim reservation.
Similarly,Mr.Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) bearing HT.No 10601169 scored 649 but was awarded only 21 in the interview. Someone who could have made it into DC in open competition had to settle for DSP.
Almost similar is the case of Mr.Narasimha Rao Ch (SC) bearing HTNo.10703131 who got a decent score of 598 but was awarded the least of all just 13 marks in the interview and had to settle for Assistant Audit Officer., though people who had scored lesser marks than him in the written got Dy.SP and that too in open competition.
Another incident relates to Mr.Samayjan Rao Ch(SC) bearing HT No.10606097 who secured 616 marks in written, i.e. joint 3rd highest among all the candidates selected for DSP post but only 13.5 in the interview. The combined tally now placed him on 21st position and he had to settle for the post of DSP under reservation quota
In the case of Mr. Hemantha Naga Raju (BC-A) HT. No. 10704284 and Mr. Meera Prasad E (BC-B),HT No. 10500554 candidates who got lesser marks (in written) than them got selected as DSPs in open competition, while they had to claim reservation to get selected as an AES and RTO resply.
Mr. Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) HT No.10300512 scored 628 marks and was in the reckoning for Deputy Collector . However, he was awarded only 21 in the interview and the tally of 649 was good enough only for DSP Jails.
Mr. Srinivasa Rao T (BC-D) HT No.10702583 got 611 marks in written but 46 in interview and the total of 660 was just 10 marks short of being selected as a DSP in the open competition.
Mr. Yadagiri Rao N (BC-D) HT No.12257674 got 621 and 36 and a total of 657, candidates who scored less than him had become Dy. Collectors, CTOs, RTOs and DSPs in Open Competition, while he had to settle for Municipal Commissioner Grade-II.
Ms. Revathi Dedeepya M(BC-D)HT No. 12203641 got 601 and 32 and a total of 633, while some who scored less than her had become Dy. Collectors and that too in open competition she had to contend with AAO (Local Fund)
Madam, you would be aware that the UPSC and other Public Service Commissions in India hardly, if ever, award more than 80% in the interview to any candidate. It was shocking to note that the average marks of the selected candidates belonging to a particular community was 73 out of 90 marks, which in itself is more than 80%, while the average marks for OCs (other than that community) was a reasonable 64; and 60 for SCs, 60 for BCs and 53 for STs.
That’s not all Madam, an unbelievably high 138 out of 550 candidates (312 plum Group-1 posts plus 238 MPDO posts) were awarded marks equal to or more than 80% in the interviews, i.e. 72 or more out of 90. Further, a staggering 29 candidates were awarded 81 marks or more, i.e. in excess of 90% with the highest being 88 out of 90 HT No. 12219893, i.e., an unprecedented 98%.
The benevolence on the part of the APPSC is such that even the deeds of Daana Veera Soora Karna would pale in comparison! Or is there something more to it than that meets the eye?!
Madam, it is plain knowledge that even in the case of elections, there is a re-poll if the turnout in a particular booth or a constituency crosses the 90% mark.
Madam, to satisfy yourself on the scale of irregularities , I humbly request you to ask the UPSC to furnish information on the number of instances (in the past 5 years, 10 years or any such duration of time that you deem fit) wherein they had awarded interview marks in excess of 80%... let alone 90%. I am sure the figure arrived at would be a fraction of those awarded 80% in just one exam conducted by the APPSC. That would present before you the enormity of the irregularities committed.
I request you Madam, to invoke the provisions of the Article 317 of the Constitution which states that, “… the CHAIRMAN or any other Member of a Public Service Commission shall only be removed from his office… on the ground of misbehaviour according to the report of the Supreme Court which shall hold an enquiry on this matter on a reference being made by the President.”
Further, Article 317 (4) clearly states that , “a Member shall be deemed to be guilty of misbehaviour… if he is in any way concerned or interested in any contract made on behalf of the Government of India or of a State…”
Madam, it is held even by the Supreme Court that, the concept of employment involves three ingredients: (1) employer, (2) employee, (3) the contract of employment. It is common knowledge that only those candidates who are recommended for selection by a Public Service Commission are awarded the contract of employment by the respective State Governments or the Central Government, as the case may be.
Thus, in this instant case, the Members of the APPSC would be guilty of misbehaviour since it has become amply clear that they awarded higher marks in the interviews to candidates belonging to a particular community. In addition to that, for deliberately, willfully and with malice awarding lesser marks to candidates from the Reserved Categories, viz., SC, ST, BC. And in addition to that Madam, the unimaginable scale of benevolence in awarding interview marks smacks of something equally if not more sinister.
It is incomprehensible to note that such highly educated and qualified person/s could’ve succumbed to the allure of nepotism/ favouritism (for whatever considerations). Madam, such undue favours shown to a particular community has played a cruel joke on the hopes and aspirations of the candidates. The interview has been turned into a charade and thus making a mockery of the recruitment procedure.
Power, prestige and perks and equally importantly, the belief in the sense of ‘fair-play’ in recruitment is what attracts the bright students towards the Public Services. Such instances of nepotism on the one hand and discrimination on the other, strike at the roots of the belief and can have a devastating effect on the aspirants’ psyche and outlook towards the system as a whole.
Madam, I humbly request you call for a Supreme Court inquiry by exercising the powers vested in you under the Art. 317 of the Constitution of India into this matter so that the truth is brought out into the open and the trust of the common man, at least, in Autonomous Institutions is restored.
Thanking you Madam,
Yours faithfully,
(Sunand P)
Copy submitted to:
1. H.E. The Hon’ble Governor of Andhra Pradesh.
HIGH MARKS
Unbelievably High
Name of the candidate HT No. Marks Obtained
1.Prabhakar Reddy 11004313 634 75 709
2.Venkata Ramana Reddy 11209318 635 85 720
3.Ravi kiran Reddy M 11005332 570 82 652
4.Narayana Reddy 12241065 589 82 671
5.Srinivasa Reddy S 11010189 586 75 661
6.Chandra Shekar Reddy 12239093 582 84 666
7.Mary Prashanthi Dasari 10602743 578 72.5 650.5
8.Venugopal Reddy 12216921 657 73 732
9.Jitender Reddy 12202403 602 83 685
10.Raghunadha Reddy 20929096 602 78 680
11.Madhusudhan Reddy G 20928614 588 87 675
12.Ramsunder Reddy 12215715 583 81 664
13.Srinivasa Reddy 11010189 587 75 661
14.Anil Kumar Reddy 11206334 594 76 670
15.Ravi Shankar Reddy 11104297 595 76 671
16.Koti Reddy Nandyala 12203647 610 85 695
17.Swapnadevi Reddy 11103570 585 75 660
18.Shanmukha Reddy 11200973 566 74.5 640.5
19.Venumadhava Reddy 11507758 565 81.5 646.5
20.Vani Reddy G 12237889 553 82 635
21.Prabhakar Reddy J 12230941 577 74.5 651.5
22.Nageshwara Reddy K 20921806 564 87 651
23.Sarveshwar Reddy 11903910 580 74 654
24. Ragha Swathi Reddy 12219893 535 88 623
25. Sreenivasulu Kancham Reddy 10901371 586 75 661
26.Gauthami M 11004536 588 85 673
27.Madhavilatha Kumari 12233721 606 77 683
28.Srilatha B 11201193 556 75 631
29.Vijay Thukaram K 20919647 581 79 660
30.Hema Indukuri 10801981 575 80 655
31.Mangala Deepti 12209330 583 73 656
32.Gopinath P 10304359 592 80 672
33.Navyatha J 20903734 575 80 655
34.Venkata Ramanaiah P 11104059 568 73 641
35.Shahirirama Chari K 12221122 567 73 640
36.Krishna Shruti K 11305095 563 73 636
37.Harish S 12201970 571 81.5 652.5
38.Chandra Mohiyar B 12211139 576 77 653
39.Moina Benazir 12220232 558 78 636
40.Srinivasu M 20929282 586 85 671
41.Narasimha Kishore Dusi 10103159 591 80 671
42.Harshavardhan Raju V 12211492 601 78 679
43.Damodara Rao A 12232640 624 74 698
44.Subba Rayudu S 12235130 601 74 675
45.Vasudeva Padmaja P 12235149 558 87 645
46.VR Gangadhara Rao 12231260 559 74 633
47.Sasikala M 11208331 546 75 621
48.Deepti G 12244335 550 74 624
49.Lavanya M 12249241 568 73 641
50.Sowmya Y 20700508 542 73 615
51.Madhavi I 12230890 560 74 634
52.Kavita Kumari M 12238137 558 73 631
53.Mallikharjuna Rao 12237957 577 83 660
54.Lakshmi Kanth S 12220565 567 85.5 652.5
55.Samrat Ashok 12224806 545 82 627
56.Susmitha Priya 10702910 528 72.5 600.5
57.Sirisha D 11301546 539 72 611
58.Sumitha Gopal Das 12219295 526 76 602
59.Devi Vara Prasad Babu 12214214 533 75 608
60.Yenkanna T 12234590 578 76 654
61.Khali Kanthi P 20912309 517 73 590
62.David Raju D 10104065 500 73 573
63.Vidyavati Kaveti 12230913 499 72 571
64.Manjee Naik B 12000008 522 74 596
65.Amoy Kumar D 12212407 614 74 688
66.Seshadri T 11200018 600 78 678
67.Shashidhara Chary 12229049 605 78 683
68.Rajesh Yarrama Chetty 11004504 534 84 618
69.U Sharada Devi 10602949 531 74 605
70.Yerrappa M 12234590 578 76 654
71.Anil Kumar T 10603538 563 76 639
72.Ramu T 12216961 577 74 651
73.Sreemathi Bayri 12232865 557 74 631
74.Rajakumari G 12222706 526 74.5 600.5
75.Saleema Shaik 11704419 552 73 625
76.Saisekhar Y 12214353 551 80 631
77.Reddy Giri P 12238024 583 76 659
78.Aruna Jangiti 12239942 573 72 645
79.Srinivasa Rao K 10203773 560 79 639
80.Hima Bindu S 10604926 545 79 624
81.Siva Prasad GV 10601614 563 80 643
82.Chakravarthi Kadium 11006561 556 81 637
83.Rajaram Manohar V 11206675 543 77.5 620.5
84.Parthasaradhi G 11209221 559 73 632
85.Ranjitha C 11608299 551 78 629
86.Rajkumar K 11800021 545 74.5 619.5
87.Indira P 12213971 553 72 625
88.Madhusudhan Reddy 12230547 547 77 624
89.Saritha KGV 12242304 541 74 615
90.Srinivasa Rao M 20929077 543 80 623
91.Kurmanath R 10204131 555 72 623
92.Siva Ram Prasad T 12229507 546 74 620
93.Seshagiri M 12229686 557 77 634
94.Venkaiah N 91204546 566 76 642
95.Naveen Nicolas 12224916 559 76 635
Irrespective of the communities they belong to, 95 out of 312 candidates (31%) were awarded interview marks in excess of 72 out of 90, i.e. more than 80%.
If we include the candidates who have been selected to the Posts of MPDO, the number of candidates who secured 72 or more ( more than 80%) stands at a mind-boggling 138 out of 550.
36 candidates got marks in excess of 81 out of 90 (a staggering 90%)! The Highest being 88 out of 90. (i.e. an unbelievable 98%).
It is pertinent to mention that hardly any Public Service Commission in India including the Union Public Service Commission awards interview marks in excess of 80%.to any candidate
Name of the candidate HT No. Marks Obtained
1.Prabhakar Reddy 11004313 634 75 709
2.Venkata Ramana Reddy 11209318 635 85 720
3.Ravi kiran Reddy M 11005332 570 82 652
4.Narayana Reddy 12241065 589 82 671
5.Srinivasa Reddy S 11010189 586 75 661
6.Chandra Shekar Reddy 12239093 582 84 666
7.Mary Prashanthi Dasari 10602743 578 72.5 650.5
8.Venugopal Reddy 12216921 657 73 732
9.Jitender Reddy 12202403 602 83 685
10.Raghunadha Reddy 20929096 602 78 680
11.Madhusudhan Reddy G 20928614 588 87 675
12.Ramsunder Reddy 12215715 583 81 664
13.Srinivasa Reddy 11010189 587 75 661
14.Anil Kumar Reddy 11206334 594 76 670
15.Ravi Shankar Reddy 11104297 595 76 671
16.Koti Reddy Nandyala 12203647 610 85 695
17.Swapnadevi Reddy 11103570 585 75 660
18.Shanmukha Reddy 11200973 566 74.5 640.5
19.Venumadhava Reddy 11507758 565 81.5 646.5
20.Vani Reddy G 12237889 553 82 635
21.Prabhakar Reddy J 12230941 577 74.5 651.5
22.Nageshwara Reddy K 20921806 564 87 651
23.Sarveshwar Reddy 11903910 580 74 654
24. Ragha Swathi Reddy 12219893 535 88 623
25. Sreenivasulu Kancham Reddy 10901371 586 75 661
26.Gauthami M 11004536 588 85 673
27.Madhavilatha Kumari 12233721 606 77 683
28.Srilatha B 11201193 556 75 631
29.Vijay Thukaram K 20919647 581 79 660
30.Hema Indukuri 10801981 575 80 655
31.Mangala Deepti 12209330 583 73 656
32.Gopinath P 10304359 592 80 672
33.Navyatha J 20903734 575 80 655
34.Venkata Ramanaiah P 11104059 568 73 641
35.Shahirirama Chari K 12221122 567 73 640
36.Krishna Shruti K 11305095 563 73 636
37.Harish S 12201970 571 81.5 652.5
38.Chandra Mohiyar B 12211139 576 77 653
39.Moina Benazir 12220232 558 78 636
40.Srinivasu M 20929282 586 85 671
41.Narasimha Kishore Dusi 10103159 591 80 671
42.Harshavardhan Raju V 12211492 601 78 679
43.Damodara Rao A 12232640 624 74 698
44.Subba Rayudu S 12235130 601 74 675
45.Vasudeva Padmaja P 12235149 558 87 645
46.VR Gangadhara Rao 12231260 559 74 633
47.Sasikala M 11208331 546 75 621
48.Deepti G 12244335 550 74 624
49.Lavanya M 12249241 568 73 641
50.Sowmya Y 20700508 542 73 615
51.Madhavi I 12230890 560 74 634
52.Kavita Kumari M 12238137 558 73 631
53.Mallikharjuna Rao 12237957 577 83 660
54.Lakshmi Kanth S 12220565 567 85.5 652.5
55.Samrat Ashok 12224806 545 82 627
56.Susmitha Priya 10702910 528 72.5 600.5
57.Sirisha D 11301546 539 72 611
58.Sumitha Gopal Das 12219295 526 76 602
59.Devi Vara Prasad Babu 12214214 533 75 608
60.Yenkanna T 12234590 578 76 654
61.Khali Kanthi P 20912309 517 73 590
62.David Raju D 10104065 500 73 573
63.Vidyavati Kaveti 12230913 499 72 571
64.Manjee Naik B 12000008 522 74 596
65.Amoy Kumar D 12212407 614 74 688
66.Seshadri T 11200018 600 78 678
67.Shashidhara Chary 12229049 605 78 683
68.Rajesh Yarrama Chetty 11004504 534 84 618
69.U Sharada Devi 10602949 531 74 605
70.Yerrappa M 12234590 578 76 654
71.Anil Kumar T 10603538 563 76 639
72.Ramu T 12216961 577 74 651
73.Sreemathi Bayri 12232865 557 74 631
74.Rajakumari G 12222706 526 74.5 600.5
75.Saleema Shaik 11704419 552 73 625
76.Saisekhar Y 12214353 551 80 631
77.Reddy Giri P 12238024 583 76 659
78.Aruna Jangiti 12239942 573 72 645
79.Srinivasa Rao K 10203773 560 79 639
80.Hima Bindu S 10604926 545 79 624
81.Siva Prasad GV 10601614 563 80 643
82.Chakravarthi Kadium 11006561 556 81 637
83.Rajaram Manohar V 11206675 543 77.5 620.5
84.Parthasaradhi G 11209221 559 73 632
85.Ranjitha C 11608299 551 78 629
86.Rajkumar K 11800021 545 74.5 619.5
87.Indira P 12213971 553 72 625
88.Madhusudhan Reddy 12230547 547 77 624
89.Saritha KGV 12242304 541 74 615
90.Srinivasa Rao M 20929077 543 80 623
91.Kurmanath R 10204131 555 72 623
92.Siva Ram Prasad T 12229507 546 74 620
93.Seshagiri M 12229686 557 77 634
94.Venkaiah N 91204546 566 76 642
95.Naveen Nicolas 12224916 559 76 635
Irrespective of the communities they belong to, 95 out of 312 candidates (31%) were awarded interview marks in excess of 72 out of 90, i.e. more than 80%.
If we include the candidates who have been selected to the Posts of MPDO, the number of candidates who secured 72 or more ( more than 80%) stands at a mind-boggling 138 out of 550.
36 candidates got marks in excess of 81 out of 90 (a staggering 90%)! The Highest being 88 out of 90. (i.e. an unbelievable 98%).
It is pertinent to mention that hardly any Public Service Commission in India including the Union Public Service Commission awards interview marks in excess of 80%.to any candidate
Low Marks
Abyssmally Low
Name of the candidate HT No. Marks Obtained
1.Narasimha Rao Ch (SC) 10703131 598 13 611
2.Samayjan Rao Ch (SC) 10606097 616 13.5 629.5
3.Dhansingh Kelothu (ST) 12208746 552 16 568
4.Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) 10601169 649 21 670
5.Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) 10300512 628 21 649
6.Haritha Mundrathi (BC-B) 12232473 613 21 634
7.Srinivas M (OC) 10606604 624 23.5 647.5
8 Hemantha Naga Raju (BC-A) 10704284 604 24 628
9.Maheshwara Raju M (OC) 10901830 608 25 633
10.Lakshmi Madhavi Palli (OC) 10803110 589 26 615
11.Chandra Shekar Goud (BC-B) 12232100 678 28 706
12.Janaki Dharavath (ST) 12211285 548 28 576
13.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-B)12203120 687 32 719
14.Revathi Dedeepya M(BC-D) 12203641 601 32 633
15.Balashankar Annaram (OC) 12209162 584 32 616
16.Nagaraju A (OC) 12231084 618 33 651
17.Meera Prasad E (BC-A) 10500554 605 35.5 740.5
18.Yadagiri Rao N (BC-D) 12257674 621 36 657
19.Chandra Rao B (BC-A) 12229687 571 36 607
20.S Lakshmi (BC-A) 11000713 578 36.5 614.5
21.Goverdhan S (BC-D) 11902542 601 38 639
22.Hema Bhanu N (BC-D) 12215227 574 38.5 612.5
23.Vasundhara G (OC) 12215277 574 38.5 612.5
24.Aruna Kumari B (BC-D) 10101467 563 39.5 602.5
Out of the 24 who scored less than 40 marks out of 90, 14 belong to the BCs (i.e. 58%) and out of the 14, 7 belong to BC-D Least marks were awarded to SC candidates, while there are no Reddys who secured under 40.
But most striking is the case of Mr.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-B) bearing HT No.12203120. He got a top score of 687 in the written exam, but got only 32 in the inerview taking his tally to 719 and had to be content with 4th overall.
Similarly, Mr.Chandra Shekar Goud (BC-B) bearing HT No.12232100 secured 678 marks in the written (2nd highest ) but was awarded only 28 in the interview taking to total to 706. He missed the chance of becoming a Deputy Collector (DC) by 1 mark
Similarly, Ms. Haritha Mundrathi who secured the highest written score (613) among the women Deputy Collectors. However, only 21 marks were awarded to her and she lost the opportunity of becoming a DC in the open category and had to claim reservation.
Similarly,Mr.Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) bearing HT.No 10601169 scored 649 but was awarded only 21 in the interview. Someone who could have made it into DC in open competition had to settle for DSP.
Almost similar is the case of Mr.Narasimha Rao Ch (SC) bearing HTNo.10703131 who got a decent score of 598 but was awarded the least of all just 13 marks in the interview.and had to settle for Assistant Audit Officer., though people who had scored lesser marks than him in the written got Dy.SP and that too in open competition.
Another incident relates to Mr.Samayjan Rao Ch(SC) bearing HT No.10606097 who secured 616 marks in written, i.e. joint 3rd highest among all the candidates selected for DSP post but only 13.5 in the interview. The combined tally now placed him on 21st position and he had to settle for the post of DSP under reservation quota
Hemantha Naga Raju (BC-A) and Meera Prasad E (BC-B)---- candidates who got lesser marks (in written) than them got selected as DSPs in open competition, while they had to claim reservation to get selected as an AES and RTO resply.
Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) HT No.10300512 scored 628 marks and was in the reckoning for Deputy Collector . However, he was awarded only 21 in the interview and the tally of 649 was good enough only for DSP Jails.
Srinivasa Rao T (BC-D) HT No.10702583 got 611 marks in written but 46 in interview and the total of 660 was just 10 marks short of being selected as a DSP in the open competition.
Yadagiri Rao N (BC-D) HT No.12257674 got 621 and 36 and a total of 657, candidates who scored less than him had become Dy. Collectors, CTOs, RTOs and DSPs in Open Competition, while he had to settle for Municipal Commissioner Grade-II.
Revathi Dedeepya M(BC-D) 12203641 got 601 and 32 and a total of 633, while some who scored less than her had become Dy. Collectors she had to contend with AAO (Local Fund)
The list goes on and on…
The things that come to mind are:
A) Is there a pattern to such wide discrepancy in the percentage of marks scored in the written and interviews respectively?
B) Was there a deliberate attempt on someone’s part to deny candidates from making it in the open competition?!
In the case of OCs
Srinivas M (OC) HT No. 10606604 got 624 and 23.5, i.e. a total of 647.5 and Maheshwara Raju M (OC) HT. No. 10901830 got 608 and 25 and a total of 633 and were in the reckoning for much better posts, i.e., DSP, CTO, etc. However, because of the low marks awarded in they interview they had to settle for Asst. Accounts Officer post.
Similarly, Nagaraju A (OC) HT. No. 12231084 secured 618 in the written and only 33 in the interview to get a tally of 651 too was in the reckoning for much better posts, i.e., DSP, CTO, etc but had to settle for AAO/ ATO.
Similarly, Lakshmi Madhavi Palli (OC) HT. No.10803110 got 589 and 26 in written and interview, i.e. a total of 615 and had to contend with AAO (Local Fund), while some who scored less than her in written had become Dy. Collectors.
It remains to be seen which region they hail from and who conducted their interviews!
Name of the candidate HT No. Marks Obtained
1.Narasimha Rao Ch (SC) 10703131 598 13 611
2.Samayjan Rao Ch (SC) 10606097 616 13.5 629.5
3.Dhansingh Kelothu (ST) 12208746 552 16 568
4.Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) 10601169 649 21 670
5.Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) 10300512 628 21 649
6.Haritha Mundrathi (BC-B) 12232473 613 21 634
7.Srinivas M (OC) 10606604 624 23.5 647.5
8 Hemantha Naga Raju (BC-A) 10704284 604 24 628
9.Maheshwara Raju M (OC) 10901830 608 25 633
10.Lakshmi Madhavi Palli (OC) 10803110 589 26 615
11.Chandra Shekar Goud (BC-B) 12232100 678 28 706
12.Janaki Dharavath (ST) 12211285 548 28 576
13.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-B)12203120 687 32 719
14.Revathi Dedeepya M(BC-D) 12203641 601 32 633
15.Balashankar Annaram (OC) 12209162 584 32 616
16.Nagaraju A (OC) 12231084 618 33 651
17.Meera Prasad E (BC-A) 10500554 605 35.5 740.5
18.Yadagiri Rao N (BC-D) 12257674 621 36 657
19.Chandra Rao B (BC-A) 12229687 571 36 607
20.S Lakshmi (BC-A) 11000713 578 36.5 614.5
21.Goverdhan S (BC-D) 11902542 601 38 639
22.Hema Bhanu N (BC-D) 12215227 574 38.5 612.5
23.Vasundhara G (OC) 12215277 574 38.5 612.5
24.Aruna Kumari B (BC-D) 10101467 563 39.5 602.5
Out of the 24 who scored less than 40 marks out of 90, 14 belong to the BCs (i.e. 58%) and out of the 14, 7 belong to BC-D Least marks were awarded to SC candidates, while there are no Reddys who secured under 40.
But most striking is the case of Mr.Shiva Lingaiah Chettipally (BC-B) bearing HT No.12203120. He got a top score of 687 in the written exam, but got only 32 in the inerview taking his tally to 719 and had to be content with 4th overall.
Similarly, Mr.Chandra Shekar Goud (BC-B) bearing HT No.12232100 secured 678 marks in the written (2nd highest ) but was awarded only 28 in the interview taking to total to 706. He missed the chance of becoming a Deputy Collector (DC) by 1 mark
Similarly, Ms. Haritha Mundrathi who secured the highest written score (613) among the women Deputy Collectors. However, only 21 marks were awarded to her and she lost the opportunity of becoming a DC in the open category and had to claim reservation.
Similarly,Mr.Gangadhar Reddy (BC-D) bearing HT.No 10601169 scored 649 but was awarded only 21 in the interview. Someone who could have made it into DC in open competition had to settle for DSP.
Almost similar is the case of Mr.Narasimha Rao Ch (SC) bearing HTNo.10703131 who got a decent score of 598 but was awarded the least of all just 13 marks in the interview.and had to settle for Assistant Audit Officer., though people who had scored lesser marks than him in the written got Dy.SP and that too in open competition.
Another incident relates to Mr.Samayjan Rao Ch(SC) bearing HT No.10606097 who secured 616 marks in written, i.e. joint 3rd highest among all the candidates selected for DSP post but only 13.5 in the interview. The combined tally now placed him on 21st position and he had to settle for the post of DSP under reservation quota
Hemantha Naga Raju (BC-A) and Meera Prasad E (BC-B)---- candidates who got lesser marks (in written) than them got selected as DSPs in open competition, while they had to claim reservation to get selected as an AES and RTO resply.
Rajeshwara Rao K (BC-D) HT No.10300512 scored 628 marks and was in the reckoning for Deputy Collector . However, he was awarded only 21 in the interview and the tally of 649 was good enough only for DSP Jails.
Srinivasa Rao T (BC-D) HT No.10702583 got 611 marks in written but 46 in interview and the total of 660 was just 10 marks short of being selected as a DSP in the open competition.
Yadagiri Rao N (BC-D) HT No.12257674 got 621 and 36 and a total of 657, candidates who scored less than him had become Dy. Collectors, CTOs, RTOs and DSPs in Open Competition, while he had to settle for Municipal Commissioner Grade-II.
Revathi Dedeepya M(BC-D) 12203641 got 601 and 32 and a total of 633, while some who scored less than her had become Dy. Collectors she had to contend with AAO (Local Fund)
The list goes on and on…
The things that come to mind are:
A) Is there a pattern to such wide discrepancy in the percentage of marks scored in the written and interviews respectively?
B) Was there a deliberate attempt on someone’s part to deny candidates from making it in the open competition?!
In the case of OCs
Srinivas M (OC) HT No. 10606604 got 624 and 23.5, i.e. a total of 647.5 and Maheshwara Raju M (OC) HT. No. 10901830 got 608 and 25 and a total of 633 and were in the reckoning for much better posts, i.e., DSP, CTO, etc. However, because of the low marks awarded in they interview they had to settle for Asst. Accounts Officer post.
Similarly, Nagaraju A (OC) HT. No. 12231084 secured 618 in the written and only 33 in the interview to get a tally of 651 too was in the reckoning for much better posts, i.e., DSP, CTO, etc but had to settle for AAO/ ATO.
Similarly, Lakshmi Madhavi Palli (OC) HT. No.10803110 got 589 and 26 in written and interview, i.e. a total of 615 and had to contend with AAO (Local Fund), while some who scored less than her in written had become Dy. Collectors.
It remains to be seen which region they hail from and who conducted their interviews!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)